bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Causal Effects of Pupil Size on Visual Processing
S. Mathot, H. Berberyan, P. Buchel, V. Ruuskanen, A. Vilotijevic, W. Kruijne
Abstract
The size of the eyes pupils determines how much light enters the eye and also how well this light is focused. Through this route, pupil size shapes the earliest stages of visual processing. Yet causal effects of pupil size on vision are poorly understood and rarely studied. Here we report the effects of both experimentally induced and spontaneous changes in pupil size on visual processing as measured through EEG. We compare these to the effects of stimulus intensity and covert visual attention, because previous studies have shown that these factors all have comparable effects on some common measures of early visual processing, such as detection performance and steady-state visual evoked potentials; yet it is still unclear whether these are superficial similarities, or rather whether they reflect similar underlying processes. Using a mix of neural-network decoding, ERP analyses, and time-frequency analyses, we find that induced pupil size, spontaneous pupil size, stimulus intensity, and covert visual attention all affect EEG responses, mainly over occipital and parietal electrodes, but--crucially--that they do so in qualitatively different ways. Induced and spontaneous pupil-size changes mainly modulate activity patterns (but not overall power or intertrial coherence) in the high-frequency beta range; this may reflect a causal effect of pupil size on oculomotor activity and/ or visual processing. In addition, spontaneous (but not induced) pupil size tends to correlate positively with intertrial coherence in the alpha band; this may reflect a non-causal relationship, mediated by arousal. Taken together, our findings suggest that pupil size has qualitatively different effects on visual processing from stimulus intensity and covert visual attention. This shows that pupil size causally affects visual processing, and provides concrete starting points for further study of this important yet understudied earliest stage of visual processing.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spontaneous Fluctuations in Pupil Size Shape Retinal Responses to Visual Stimuli
Sebastiaan Mathôt, Daria Weiden, Olaf Dimigen·bioRxiv·May 14, 2024
- Larger Pupils are Associated with Improved Visual, but not Auditory, Near-Threshold Detection
Veera Ruuskanen, Sebastiaan Mathôt·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026
- Pupil Size Asymmetries Are Modulated By An Interaction Between Attentional Load And Task Experience
Basil Wahn, Daniel Perry Ferris, … Peter König B·bioRxiv·May 15, 2017
- Active and predictive adjustment of pupil size for accommodating visual regularity
Jianrong Jia, Zhiming Kong, Fang Fang·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2025
- The interplay of spontaneous pupil-size fluctuations and EEG power in near-threshold detection
Veera Ruuskanen, C. Nico Boehler, Sebastiaan Mathôt·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2025
- Pupil size correlates with near-threshold detection performance irrespective of stimulus colour, eccentricity, or retinal adaptation-state
Veera Ruuskanen, Sebastiaan Mathôt·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2025