bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Rare-variant aggregate association analysis using imputed data is a powerful approach.
Tianyi Liu, Paul Livermore AueriD, Gao T. WangiD, Elnaz NaderiiD, Andrew Thomas DeWaniD, Suzanne M. LealiD
Abstract
Imputation can cost-effectively generate genotypes for millions of variants. The power of performing rare variant aggregate association tests using imputed genotypes was evaluated. White Europeans from the UK Biobank with exome sequence and genotype array data were analyzed. Using the genotype type array data from the UK Biobank, imputation was performed using the HRC r1.1 (N=64,976 Haplotypes) and TOPMed r3 (N=267,194 haplotypes) reference panels. Simulations were used to compare the power of performing rare variant aggregate association analysis using sequence and imputed data. Additionally, the number of genes with >2 rare variants (missense, nonsense, splice site) was approximately the same for exome sequence and TOPMed imputed data, but HRC imputed data had [~]10% fewer genes. For the imputed data, using a less stringent R2 threshold (i.e., >0.3 vs. >0.8) led to greater power to detect aggregate associations due to additional rare variants included in the test. Exome sequence data provided the highest power for rare variant aggregate association testing, with TOPMed imputed variants usually having less than a 20% reduction in power. HRC imputed variants provided substantially less power. We also performed rare variant aggregate association analyses using UK Biobank phenotype, exome sequence data, and imputed variants for PCSK9 and low-density lipoprotein (N=159,904 study subjects) and APOC3 and triglyceride levels (N=160,036 study subjects). For these analyses, even when ultra-rare variants (minor allele frequency<0.001) were analyzed, significant aggregate associations could be detected for the exome sequence data and TOPMed and HRC imputed variants. Although there is a decrease in power for rare variant aggregate association tests when analyzing imputed variants compared to sequence data due to missing variants and uncertainty in genotypes, analysis of imputed data is a viable approach to detect rare variant aggregate associations when sequence data is unavailable.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Boosting the power of rare variant association studies by imputation using large-scale sequencing population
Jinglan Dai, Yixin Zhang, … Sipeng Shen·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2025
- Whole-exome imputation within UK Biobank powers rare coding variant association and fine-mapping analyses
Alison R. Barton, Maxwell A. Sherman, … Po‐Ru Loh·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2021
- A Genomics England haplotype reference panel and the imputation of the UK Biobank
Sinan Shi, Simone Rubinacci, … Simon Robert Myers·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2024
- Why are rare variants hard to impute? Coalescent models reveal theoretical limits in existing algorithms.
Yichen Si, Brett R. Vanderwerff, Sebastian K. Zöllner·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2021
- Advantages of genotype imputation with ethnically matched reference panel for rare variant association analyses
Mart Kals, Tiit Nikopensius, … Reedik Mägi·bioRxiv·Apr 4, 2019
- Rare variants association testing for a binary outcome when pooling individual level data from heterogeneous studies
Tamar Sofer, Na Guo·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2020