The American Journal of Human GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Understanding changes in genetic literacy over time and in genetic research participants
Abstract
As genomic and personalized medicine becomes mainstream, assessing and understanding the publics genetic literacy is paramount. Because genetic research drives innovation in this area and involves much of the public, it is equally important to assess its impact on genetic literacy. We designed a survey to assess genetic literacy in three ways (familiarity, knowledge, and skills) and distributed it to two distinct samples: 2050 members of the general population, and 2023 individuals currently enrolled in a large-scale genetic research study. We compared these data to a similar survey implemented in 2013. The results indicate that familiarity with basic genetic terms in 2021 (M = 5.36, p<.001) and knowledge of genetic concepts in 2021 (M = 9.06, p = 0.002) is significantly higher compared to 2013 (M = 5.08; M = 8.72). Those currently enrolled in a genetic study were also significantly more familiar with genetic terms (M = 5.79, p<.001), more knowledgeable of genetic concepts (M = 10.27, p<.001), and scored higher in skills (M = 3.57, p<.001) than the general population (M = 4.98; M = 9.06; M = 2.65).The results suggest that genetic literacy is improving over time, though there is room for improvement. The data also suggest that participating in genetic research is one avenue for improving genetic literacy. We conclude that educational interventions are needed to ensure familiarity with and comprehension of basic genetic concepts. We also suggest further exploration of the impact of genetic research participation on genetic literacy to determine mechanisms for potential interventions.
- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Knowledge and misconceptions of the French population regarding medical genetics: a survey of 3,000 respondents
Sandra Mercier, Francois Michael Petit, … "Genetics and the General Public" FFGH Ethics Working Group·medRxiv·Jul 19, 2026
- Challenges in Improving Genomic Literacy: Results from National and Regional Surveys of Genomic Knowledge, Attitudes, Concerns, and Behaviors
J. Jaeger, A. Hellwig, … J. A. Surtees·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2022
- The Genetics of Participation: Method and Analysis
Stefania Benónísdóttir, Augustine Kong·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2023
- Who defines the "personal utility" of genetic and genomic testing? A systematic review
Emily G. Miller, Jennifer Louise Young, … Meghan C. Halley·medRxiv·Dec 4, 2022
- The NYCKidSeq randomized controlled trial: Impact of GUIA digitally enhanced genetic counseling in racially and ethnically diverse families
Sabrina A. Suckiel, Nicole Kelly, … Eimear E. Kenny·medRxiv·Jul 5, 2023
- Factors associated with sharing email information and mental health survey participation in two large population cohorts
Mark J. Adams, William David Hill, … Andrew Mark McIntosh·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2019