GigaScienceBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A field guide for the compositional analysis of any-omics data
Thomas P. QuinniD, Ionas ErbiD, Gregory Brian GlooriD, Cédric NotredameiD, Mark F. RichardsoniD, Tamsyn M. CrowleyiD
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made it possible to determine the sequence and relative abundance of all nucleotides in a biological or environmental sample. Today, NGS is routinely used to understand many important topics in biology from human disease to microorganism diversity. A cornerstone of NGS is the quantification of RNA or DNA presence as counts. However, these counts are not counts per se: the magnitude of the counts are determined arbitrarily by the sequencing depth, not by the input material. Consequently, counts must undergo normalization prior to use. Conventional normalization methods require a set of assumptions: they assume that the majority of features are unchanged, and that all environments under study have the same carrying capacity for nucleotide synthesis. These assumptions are often untestable and may not hold when comparing heterogeneous samples (e.g., samples collected across distinct cancers or tissues). Instead, methods developed within the field of compositional data analysis offer a general solution that is assumption-free and valid for all data. In this manuscript, we synthesize the extant literature to provide a concise guide on how to apply compositional data analysis to NGS count data. In doing so, we review zero replacement, differential abundance analysis, and within-group and between-group coordination analysis. We then discuss how this pipeline can accommodate complex study design, facilitate the analysis of vertically and horizontally integrated data, including multiomics data, and further extend to single-cell sequencing data. In highlighting the limitations of total library size, effective library size, and spike-in normalizations, we propose the log-ratio transformation as a general solution to answer the question, \"Relative to some important activity of the cell, what is changing?\". Taken together, this manuscript establishes the first fully comprehensive analysis protocol that is suitable for any and all -omics data.
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: multiome
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: contrastive learning
- Citations
- 351
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analysis And Correction Of Compositional Bias In Sparse Sequencing Count Data
M. S. Binoj Kumar, ERIC V. SLUD, … Héctor Corrada Bravo·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 6, 2018
- Compositional Data Analysis is necessary for simulating and analyzing RNA-Seq data
Warren A. McGee, Harold Pimentel, … Jane Y. Wu·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2019
- Amalgams: data-driven amalgamation for the reference-free dimensionality reduction of zero-laden compositional data
Thomas P. Quinn, Ionas Erb·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 2, 2020
- Understanding sequencing data as compositions: anoutlook and review
Thomas P. Quinn, Ionas Erb, … Tamsyn M. Crowley·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2018
- Geometric averaging provides normalization-invariant feature ranking in compositional sequencing data
Emilia Nunzi, Luigina R. Romani·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Beyond library size: a field guide to NGS normalization
Jelena Aleksic, Sarah Carl, Michaela Frye·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2014