bioRxivEcology
Improved biodiversity detection using a large-volume environmental DNA sampler with in situ filtration and implications for marine eDNA sampling strategies
A. F. Govindarajan, L. McCartin, A. Adams, E. Allan, A. Belani, R. Francolini, J. Fujii, D. Gomez-Ibanez, A. Kukulya, F. Marin, K. Tradd, D. R. Yoerger, J. M. McDermott, S. Herrera
Abstract
Metabarcoding analysis of environmental DNA samples is a promising new tool for marine biodiversity and conservation. Typically, seawater samples are obtained using Niskin bottles and filtered to collect eDNA. However, standard sample volumes are small relative to the scale of the environment, conventional collection strategies are limited, and the filtration process is time consuming. To overcome these limitations, we developed a new large - volume eDNA sampler with in situ filtration, capable of taking up to 12 samples per deployment. We conducted three deployments of our sampler on the robotic vehicle Mesobot in the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico and collected samples from 20 to 400 m depth. We compared the large volume ([~]40 - 60 liters) samples collected by Mesobot with small volume ([~]2 liters) samples collected using the conventional CTD - mounted Niskin bottle approach. We sequenced the V9 region of 18S rRNA, which detects a broad range of invertebrate taxa, and found that while both methods detected biodiversity changes associated with depth, our large volume samples detected approximately 66% more taxa than the CTD small volume samples. We found that the fraction of the eDNA signal originating from metazoans relative to the total eDNA signal decreased with sampling depth, indicating that larger volume samples may be especially important for detecting metazoans in mesopelagic and deep ocean environments. We also noted substantial variability in biological replicates from both the large volume Mesobot and small volume CTD sample sets. Both of the sample sets also identified taxa that the other did not - although the number of unique taxa associated with the Mesobot samples was almost four times larger than those from the CTD samples. Large volume eDNA sampling with in situ filtration, particularly when coupled with robotic platforms, has great potential for marine biodiversity surveys, and we discuss practical methodological and sampling considerations for future applications.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes
Beverly McClenaghan, Nicole Fahner, … Mehrdad Hajibabaei·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2020
- Depth-dependent eDNA abundances across ecosystems inform deep-sea sampling strategies
Santiago Herrera, Annette F. Govindarajan, … Nina Yang·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
S. Stauffer, M. Jucker, … C. Waldock·bioRxiv·May 26, 2021
- An assessment of environmental metabarcoding protocols aiming at favouring contemporary biodiversity in inventories of deep-sea communities
Miriam I. Brandt, Blandine Trouche, … Sophie Arnaud‐Haond·Frontiers in Marine SciencePeer-reviewed·May 8, 2020
- Ferries and environmental DNA: underway sampling from commercial vessels provides new opportunities for systematic genetic surveys of marine biodiversity
Elena Valsecchi, Antonella Arcangeli, … Simon J. Goodman·Frontiers in Marine SciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2021
- DNA Divers: volunteer-based eDNA capture for local and global marine biodiversity monitoring
Erika F. Neave, Annie Watson, … Stefano Mariani·bioRxiv·May 26, 2025