PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis.
Ray SajulgaiD, Caleb EasterlyiD, Michael E. RiffleiD, Bart MesuereiD, Thilo MuthiD, Subina MehtaiD, Praveen KumariD, James E. JohnsoniD, Bjoern Gruening, Henning SchiebenhoeferiD, Carolin A. Kolmeder, Stephan FuchsiD, Brook L. NunniD, Joel D. Rudney, Timothy J. GriffiniD, Pratik Dilip JagtapiD
Abstract
To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional role of expressed microbial genes/proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein complement of the microbiome. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, so that researchers can make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental carie plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! Tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN6, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the Universal Protein Knowledgebase revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation differed between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated the most precise GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.
- Citations
- 47
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MetaX: A peptide centric metaproteomic data analysis platform using Operational Taxa-Functions (OTF)
Qing Wu, Zhibin Ning, … Daniel Figeys·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2025
- ProteoDUDes: Taxonomic profiling for metaproteomics with false positive reduction
Henning Schiebenhoefer, Thilo Muth, … Bernhard Y. Renard·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2026
- Deciphering the functioning of microbial communities: shedding light on the critical steps in metaproteomics
A. Geron, J. Werner, … S. Matallana-Surget·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2019
- PathwayPilot: A User-Friendly Tool for Visualizing and Navigating Metabolic Pathways
Tibo Vande Moortele, Pieter Verschaffelt, … Tim Van Den Bossche·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- Comparative Performance of Scribe and Database Search Engines in Metaproteomic Profiling of a Ground-Truth Microbiome Dataset
Andrew T. Rajczewski, Subina Mehta, … Pratik Dilip Jagtap·Journal of ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2025
- Meta-PepView: a metaproteomics performance evaluation and visualization platform
Ramon van der Zwaan, Berdien van Olst, … Martin Pabst·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2025