G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Phase-free local ancestry inference mitigates the impact of switch errors on phase-based methods
Abstract
Local ancestry inference (LAI) is an indispensable component of a variety of analyses in medical and population genetics, from admixture mapping to characterizing demographic history. However, the accuracy of LAI depends on a number of factors such as phase quality (for phase-based LAI methods), time since admixture of the population under study, and other factors. Here we present an empirical analysis of four LAI methods using simulated individuals of mixed African and European ancestry, examining the impact of variable phase quality and a range of demographic scenarios. We found that regardless of phasing options, calls from LAI methods that operate on unphased genotypes (phase-free LAI) have 2.6-4.6% higher Pearson correlation with the ground truth than methods that operate on phased genotypes (phase-based LAI). Applying the TRACTOR phase-correction algorithm led to modest improvements in phase-based LAI, but despite this, the Pearson correlation of phase-free LAI remained 2.4-3.8% higher than phase-corrected phase-based approaches (considering the best performing methods in each category). Phase-free and phase-based LAI accuracy differences can dramatically impact downstream analyses: estimates of the time since admixture using phase-based LAI tracts are upwardly biased by {approx}10 generations using our highest quality phased data but have virtually no bias using phase-free LAI calls. Our study underscores the strong dependence of phase-based LAI accuracy on phase quality and highlights the merits of LAI approaches that analyze unphased genetic data.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: deconvolution
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Characterizing features affecting local ancestry inference performance in admixed populations
Jessica Mauer, Nirav N. Shah, … Elizabeth G. Atkinson·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- Fast and accurate local ancestry inference with Recomb-Mix
Yuan Wei, Degui Zhi, Shaojie Zhang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2025
- A Unified Deep Learning-Based Framework for Reference-Based and Reference-Free Local Ancestry Inference
Thomas Diem·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2026
- Promises and limitations of local ancestry inference in imputed ancient genomes
Katia Bougiouri, Evan K. Irving-Pease, … Martin Petr·bioRxiv·May 20, 2026
- Improving Local Ancestry Inference through Neural Networks
Jazeps Medina Tretmanis, María C. Ávila‐Arcos, … Emilia Huerta‐Sánchez·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2026
- LoGicAl: Local ancestry and genotype calling uncertainty-aware ancestry-specific allele frequency estimation from admixed samples
Jiongming Wang, Sebastian Zöllner·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2026