The BiophysicistScientific Communication & EducationPeer-reviewed journal article
A ChatGPT Assisted Reading Protocol for Undergraduate Research Students
Marcus Sambar, Gonzalo R. Vázquez, Anne V. VázqueziD, Frank X. VázqueziD
Abstract
A major challenge for undergraduate students is reading scientific literature. This is especially true in biophysics, where many of the concepts may not have been covered in undergraduate courses. Students can become overwhelmed, which may lead to less overall engagement with the scientific literature. In response, we have developed a guided reading protocol that combines pre-reading strategies, structured notetaking, and ChatGPT to help students clarify unfamiliar concepts in an interactive way. To test the protocol, participants in this study were given an initial survey to determine their experience with reading scientific literature. After this they were given an abridged biophysics paper and the protocol. The ChatGPT transcripts were analyzed using open coding and the students were given a post-study survey. We found most students did not appear to regularly engage with the literature, possibly due to content barriers they encountered. Analyzing their transcripts, we observed that students asked for definitions, explanations, summaries, and simplifications. Overall, students reported that using ChatGPT was a positive experience and they expected to use ChatGPT in the future. From this work, we expect this new protocol may be a way to keep novice students from becoming discouraged when reading scientific papers and keep them engaged with the current literature.
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benefits and Challenges of Integrating a Generative AI Assisted Reading Guide in an Undergraduate Journal Club Assignment
Ashley Ringer McDonald, Anne V. Vázquez·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2026
- Artificial Intelligence's Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating?
Rui Yip, Young Joo Sun, … Vinit B. Mahajan·PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2025
- Biology Undergraduates Use of AI-Enabled Feedback to Revise Scientific Writing: Recipience and Barriers
Michele Weston, Tammy M. Long·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2026
- Improved science communication and student gains from an undergraduate biomedical research experience
D. Ward, Y.-Y. Han, … M. L. Manni·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2023
- PubNavigator as an undergraduate teaching tool
R. A. Marroquin-Flores, M. A. Campbell, … L. B. Limeri·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2023
- Is ChatGPT detrimental to innovation? A field experiment among university students
Mazen Hassan, Engi Amin, … Zeyad Kelani·Seikei ronsō/Review of economics and political sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2026