bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Calibrating Classifiers Across Covariates: Hierarchical Vocal Density Estimation for Acoustic Monitoring at Scale
Louis Freeland‐HaynesiD, Matthew J. WeldyiD, Amanda K. NavineiD, Patrick J. HartiD, Tom Denton, Justin A. KitzesiD
Abstract
Passive acoustic sensors and machine learning classifiers offer a scalable approach to monitoring wildlife populations. These classifiers typically detect whether a species is present in a short time-window of audio; ecologists, however, want ecologically meaningful measures such as indices of site-level abundance. Vocal density, the proportion of time-windows containing a vocalization, is a useful abundance proxy. Recovering vocal density from classifiers requires calibrating their outputs against expert-labeled data. Because classifier performance varies between sites, a single global calibration yields overconfident site-level estimates, yet calibrating every site independently requires prohibitive labeling effort. Estimating site-level vocal density at the scale of modern sensor networks demands a label-efficient alternative. We present a Bayesian hierarchical extension of Platt scaling, a commonly used calibration method, that calibrates classifiers at the site level while borrowing strength across sites. Where site-level covariates are available, a Gaussian-process prior lets the model learn how calibration varies across covariate space. Averaging calibrated per-clip probabilities across a site's recordings yields a posterior distribution over vocal density, and we show how to carry that uncertainty into downstream regressions of vocal density on environmental covariates. Across simulations and two fully annotated field datasets from Hawai'i and the Pacific Northwest, our model attained desired credible-interval coverage of vocal density estimates with narrower intervals than independent site-level calibration at equal labeling effort, and lower mean squared error. Global calibration, by contrast, failed to attain coverage except when simulated sites were genuinely homogeneous. Unlike site-level calibration, our model enables calibration at sites with zero labeled data, and incorporating covariates further improved precision when site heterogeneity was covariate-driven. Applied to a 283-site dataset in Pennsylvania with only two labeled clips per site, we recovered known habitat associations for the declining Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). Our method provides a principled, label-efficient route from bioacoustic classifier scores to site-level abundance indices with well-quantified uncertainty, making rigorous ecological inference feasible at the scale at which acoustic sensor networks are now deployed.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimating how Site-Level Differences in Acoustic Environments Affect Species Detection by Machine Learning Models
Ruari Marshall-Hawkes, Simon Gillings, … Adham Ashton‐Butt·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2025
- Is there an accurate and generalisable way to use soundscapes to monitor biodiversity?
S. S. Sethi, A. Bick, … D. A. Coomes·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2022
- The reliability of acoustic classification models for determining avian vocalisation patterns
Oliver Metcalf, Cássio Alencar Nunes, … Jos Barlow·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2025
- The BirdsPlus Index, a novel method for assessing site-level conservation values.
Eliot T. Miller, Jeffery L. Larkin, … Daniel J. Lebbin·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2025
- Acoustic remote sensing with deep learning enables non-invasive estimation of seabird nest density
Francesca Terranova, Lorenzo Todaro, … Livio Favaro·Ecological InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2026
- Soundscapes predict species occurrence in tropical forests
S. S. Sethi, R. M. Ewers, … L. Picinali·OikosPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2021