bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Conflict-Mediated Group Size Regulation: A Theory of Supraoptimal and Suboptimal Group Size
Abstract
Observed group sizes rarely match the size that would maximize what each member gets from belonging. We propose a two-part theory in which group size is regulated by two related conflicts: insider-outsider conflict over admission, and within-group conflict as crowding, competition, and social tensions intensify with size. Three strategies are available within a group of interchangeable members: admission, exclusion, and fission. The models hold each member's standing and resource exploitation strategy constant. While both vary and determine a member's own game and its payoffs, explaining this complexity and its consequences is beyond our scope. The theory's first part shows that even when exclusion is unavailable, fission dynamics alone drive group size away from the optimum in both directions, with the pattern set by how prospective joiners encounter groups and by the geometry of fission. When joiners compare groups across a shared landscape and fission is asymmetric, the standing distribution is bimodal: supra-optimal large groups coexisting with a sub-optimal mode of small groups, the pattern characteristic of fission-fusion societies. The second part promotes exclusion and fission to active decisions: incumbents weigh the per-capita cost of accommodating entry ({beta}) against the costs of coordinated exclusion (c +{gamma} N) and fissioning (F). A single inequality, {beta} > c +{gamma} N, partitions populations into two regimes: where it holds, exclusion is viable and groups lock at the optimum size; where it fails, groups grow past the optimum and cycle through recurrent fission. > {varphi} then fixes the geometry of that fission, separating splits in which members leave independently, which strand small daughters and give the bimodal distribution, from splits in which several members depart at once. Modal group size, fission frequency, and exclusion behavior together identify which regime governs a population -- a set of predictions applicable across fishes, social insects, birds, and mammals including primates and human foragers.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Coupled dynamics of predator group formation and prey populations
Talia Borofsky, Erol Akçay, … Simon Levin·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2025
- Self-organized Regulation of Group Size and Number in Natural and Artificial Collectives
Tianfu Zhang, Suet Lee, Heiko Hamann·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026
- A general theory for the dynamics of social populations: Within-group density dependence and between-group processes.
B. A. Lerch, K. C. Abbott·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2022
- Changes in group size during resource shifts reveal drivers of sociality across the tree of life
A. B. Kao, A. K. Hund, … H. F. McCreery·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2020
- Human Group Size Puzzle: Why It Is Odd That We Live in Large Societies
T. David-Barrett·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2022
- Animal group size variation in a minimal attraction-repulsion agent-based model
J. A. J. Eikelboom, A. Doelman, … H. J. De Knegt·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2024