henhaobio
Sign in

BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

LimROTS: A Hybrid Method Integrating Empirical Bayes and Reproducibility-Optimized Statistics for Robust Differential Expression Analysis

Ali Mostafa AnwariD, Akewak JebaiD, Leo LahtiiD, Eleanor T. CoffeyiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

MotivationDifferential expression analysis plays a vital role in omics research enabling precise identification of features that associate with different phenotypes. This process is critical for uncovering biological differences between conditions, such as disease versus healthy states. In proteomics, several statistical methods have been used, ranging from simple t-tests to more advanced methods like limma and ROTS. However, a flexible method for reproducibility-optimized statistics tailored for clinical omics data has been lacking. ResultsIn this study, we developed LimROTS, a hybrid method integrating the linear model and empirical Bayes method from the limma framework with the Reproducibility-Optimized Statistics from ROTS, to create a novel moderated ranking statistic, for robust and flexible analysis of proteomics data. We validated its performance using twenty-one proteomics gold standard spike-in datasets with different protein mixtures, MS instruments, and techniques for benchmarking. This hybrid approach improves accuracy and reproducibility of complex proteomics data, making LimROTS a powerful tool for high-dimensional omics data analysis. Availability and ImplementationLimROTS has been implemented as an R/Bioconductor package, available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/LimROTS/. Additionally, the code used in this study is available in GitHub repository https://github.com/AliYoussef96/LimROTSmanuscript Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=181 SRC="FIGDIR/small/636801v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (47K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e6dd66org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d1589eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@110f73corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d78ef2_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Citations
2
FWCI
0.50
Field percentile
top 45%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.