Performance of pathogen identification and resistance gene expression tests using ASTar(R) remnant bacterial suspension in Gram-negative contrived positive blood cultures

Abstract

IntroductionRapid pathogen identification, resistance detection, and susceptibility profiling improve antimicrobial prescribing and associated outcomes, but fragmented workflows lead to inefficiencies and are costly. We evaluated a research-use-only (RUO) approach using ASTar(R) remnant bacterial suspension from routine AST for MALDI-TOF MS pathogen identification and Lateral Flow Assay (LFA)-based detection of targeted resistance mechanisms. MethodsGram-negative (GN) bacterial strains from reference and curated resistance collections (CDC1, ARLG2, ATCC3) [n=119] were contrived into blood culture bottles and processed in the ASTar System using the ASTar BC G-Kit (Q-linea AB, Sweden). Under RUO conditions, remnant bacterial suspensions were collected ~1-2 h after ASTar run initiation and analyzed using NG Test CTX-M Multi, NG Test CARBA-5, NG Test Acineto-5 RUO, and MALDI-TOF MS. ResultsMean ({+/-} SD) remnant suspension volume was 2722 L ({+/-} 300 L). All samples yielded high-confidence MALDI-TOF MS scores (>2.0), with five initially scoring <2.0 and resolving on repeat testing. LFA results showed full agreement with reference isolates for blaCTX-M positive/negative (30/30) and with 60 or 61 target carbapenemase-positive/negative isolates. Testing of a subset of samples to mimic reflex workflows with ASTar phenotypic results did not affect LFA performance (n=26; 23 Enterobacterales, 3 P. aeruginosa and 9 A. baumannii). Cost savings can be realised versus commercial multiplex PCR. ConclusionThis integrated approach of ~6 h rapid phenotypic AST with same-run identification and resistance detection (1-2 h from instrument start) or reflex testing upon availability of ASTar results may support earlier susceptibility results and offer cost savings to current workflows.