Magnetic Resonance in MedicineBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
A realistic in-silico brain phantom for quantifying susceptibility anisotropy-induced error in susceptibility separation
Abstract
PurposeTo create a realistic in-silico brain phantom for positive and negative magnetic susceptibility that incorporates susceptibility anisotropy, enabling the evaluation of how susceptibility anisotropy influences susceptibility separation algorithm performance. MethodsWe expanded an existing QSM validation phantom by creating separate maps for positive and negative susceptibility, with the option of modeling susceptibility anisotropy. Multi-echo gradient echo data were simulated to evaluate four susceptibility separation techniques ({chi}-separation, DECOMPOSE-QSM, APART-QSM, and [Formula]). To assess the impact of noise, simulations were performed at different SNR levels (50, 100, 200, 300). ResultsOur findings showed that the error in negative susceptibility estimates increased by up to 53% when susceptibility anisotropy was present, compared to the case without susceptibility anisotropy, with {chi}-separation being the algorithm that was most sensitive to anisotropy. Robustness to noise varied across the assessed algorithms, with APART-QSM and {chi}-separation having the highest and lowest sensitivity to noise, respectively. ConclusionThe modified phantom is open-source and can serve as a numerical ground truth for evaluating susceptibility separation methods. Our findings emphasize the importance of incorporating susceptibility anisotropy into susceptibility separation models to improve their accuracy.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 49%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- APART-QSM: an improved sub-voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method
Zhenghao Li, Ruimin Feng, … Hongjiang Wei·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2023
- QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: a realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures
José P. Marques, Jakob Meineke, … Ferdinand Schweser·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2021
- A geometric anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative susceptibility mapping: accuracy and repeatability
Padriac Hooper, Jin Jin, … Markus Barth·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2026
- Evaluation of phantom doping materials in quantitative susceptibility mapping
- Validation of Data Acquisition and Phase Estimation for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping with a Rotating-Tube Phantom
K. E. Keenan, B. P. Berman, … J. Dagher·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2021
- QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: Design and Report of Results
Berkin Bilgiç, Christian Langkammer, … Ferdinand Schweser·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2021