bioRxivCancer Biology
Assessment of the Utility of Gene Positioning Biomarkers in the Stratification of Prostate Cancers
Abstract
In eukaryotic cells, the genome is spatially organized in a non-random fashion within the confines of the interphase nucleus, and most genes occupy preferred nuclear positions. For some genomic loci these positioning patterns are context specific, reflected in the distinct location of certain genes and chromosomes in different cell types and in disease. Disease-related differential spatial positioning of genes has led to the hypothesis that the spatial reorganization of the genome may be utilized as a diagnostic biomarker. In keeping with this possibility, the positioning patterns of specific genes can be used to reproducibly discriminate benign tissues from cancerous ones. In addition to the use of spatial genome organization for diagnostic purposes, we explore here the potential use of spatial genome organization as a prognostic tool. This is a pressing need since in many cancer types there is a lack of accurate markers to predict the aggressiveness of individual tumors. We find that directional repositioning of SP100 and TGFB3 gene loci stratifies prostate cancers of differing Gleason scores. A more peripheral position of SP100 and TGFB3 in the nucleus, compared to benign tissues, is associated with low Gleason score cancers, whereas more internal positioning correlates with higher Gleason scores. Conversely, LMNA is more internally positioned in many non-metastatic prostate cancers, while its position is indistinguishable from benign tissue in metastatic cancer. Our findings of subtype-specific gene positioning patterns in prostate cancer provides a proof-of-concept for the potential usefulness of spatial gene positioning as a prognostic biomarker.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: cancer & tumor microenvironment
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatial transcriptomic analysis of virtual prostate biopsy reveals confounding effect of heterogeneity on genomic signature scoring
Sandy Figiel, W. Yin, … Alastair D. Lamb·European UrologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2023
- Microarray analysis identifies malignant field signatures in biopsy samples at diagnosis predicting the likelihood of lethal disease in patients with localized Gleason 6 and 7 prostate cancer.
Gennadi V. Glinsky·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2016
- Annotation-Free Prediction of Cancer Cells and Glands and Spatial Analysis of Immune Cells.
Kyeong Joo Jung, Soumya Ghose, … Parag Mallick·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2025
- A highly accurate model for screening prostate cancer using propensity index panel of ten genes
Shipra Jain, Kawal Preet Kaur Malhotra, … Gajendra P. S. Raghava·Journal of Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2023
- Cancer/Testis Antigens Differentially Expressed in Prostate Cancer: Potential New Biomarkers and Targets for Immunotherapies
P. Kulkarni, N. M. Carleton, … L. Kagohara·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2019
- Proteomic-based stratification of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients
Q. Zhong, S. Rui, … P. J. Wild·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2023