NatureGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
A familial, telomere-to-telomere reference for human de novo mutation and recombination from a four-generation pedigree
David PorubskỳiD, Harriet DashnowiD, Thomas A. SasaniiD, Glennis A. LogsdoniD, Pille HallastiD, Michelle D. NoyesiD, Zev N. KronenbergiD, Tom MokveldiD, Nidhi KoundinyaiD, Cillian NolaniD, Cody J. SteelyiD, Andrea GuarracinoiD, Egor DolzhenkoiD, William T. HarveyiD, William J. RowelliD, Kirill A. GrigoreviD, Thomas J. NicholasiD, Michael E. GoldbergiD, Keisuke K. OshimaiD, Jiadong LiniD, Peter EbertiD, W. Scott WatkinsiD, Tiffany Y. Leung, Vincent C. T. HanloniD, Sean R. McGeeiD, , Evan E. EichleriD
Abstract
Using five complementary short- and long-read sequencing technologies, we phased and assembled >95% of each diploid human genome in a four-generation, 28-member family (CEPH 1463) allowing us to systematically assess de novo mutations (DNMs) and recombination. From this family, we estimate an average of 192 DNMs per generation, including 75.5 de novo single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), 7.4 non-tandem repeat indels, 79.6 de novo indels or structural variants (SVs) originating from tandem repeats, 7.7 centromeric de novo SVs and SNVs, and 12.4 de novo Y chromosome events per generation. STRs and VNTRs are the most mutable with 32 loci exhibiting recurrent mutation through the generations. We accurately assemble 288 centromeres and six Y chromosomes across the generations, documenting de novo SVs, and demonstrate that the DNM rate varies by an order of magnitude depending on repeat content, length, and sequence identity. We show a strong paternal bias (75-81%) for all forms of germline DNM, yet we estimate that 17% of de novo SNVs are postzygotic in origin with no paternal bias. We place all this variation in the context of a high-resolution recombination map ([~]3.5 kbp breakpoint resolution). We observe a strong maternal recombination bias (1.36 maternal:paternal ratio) with a consistent reduction in the number of crossovers with increasing paternal (r=0.85) and maternal (r=0.65) age. However, we observe no correlation between meiotic crossover locations and de novo SVs, arguing against non-allelic homologous recombination as a predominant mechanism. The use of multiple orthogonal technologies, near-telomere-to-telomere phased genome assemblies, and a multi-generation family to assess transmission has created the most comprehensive, publicly available "truth set" of all classes of genomic variants. The resource can be used to test and benchmark new algorithms and technologies to understand the most fundamental processes underlying human genetic variation.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 111
- FWCI
- 61.72
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Mutational Dynamics of Short Tandem Repeats in Large, Multigenerational Families
Cody J. Steely, W. Scott Watkins, … Lynn B. Jorde·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2022
- Large, three-generation CEPH families reveal post-zygotic mosaicism and variability in germline mutation accumulation
Thomas A. Sasani, Brent S. Pedersen, … Aaron R. Quinlan·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2019
- De novo structural mutation rates and gamete-of-origin biases revealed through genome sequencing of 2,396 families
Jonathan R. Belyeu, Harrison Brand, … Aaron R. Quinlan·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 6, 2021
- A sibling study of variation in parental mutation rates
Vanesa Getseva, Pelin POYRAZ, … Molly Przeworski·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2026
- Effects of parental age and polymer composition on short tandem repeat de novo mutation rates
M. E. Goldberg, M. D. Noyes, … K. Harris·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2023
- De novo mutations across 1,465 diverse genomes reveal novel mutational insights and reductions in the Amish founder population.
Michael D. Kessler, Douglas P. Loesch, … Mary Lou Biggs·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2020