bioRxivPaleontology
A community-developed extension to Darwin Core for reporting the chronometric age of specimens
L. Brenskelle, J. Wieczorek, E. Davis, K. Emery, N. J. Wallis, M. J. LeFebvre, R. Guralnick
Abstract
Darwin Core, the data standard used for sharing modern biodiversity and paleodiversity occurrence records, has previously lacked proper mechanisms for reporting what is known about the estimated age range of specimens from deep time. This has led to data providers putting these data in fields where they cannot easily be found by users, which impedes the reuse and improvement of these data by other researchers. Here we describe the development of the Chronometric Age Extension to Darwin Core, a ratified, community-developed extension that enables the reporting of ages of specimens from deeper time and the evidence supporting these estimates. The extension standardizes reporting about the methods or assays used to determine an age and other critical information like uncertainty. It gives data providers flexibility about the level of detail reported, focusing on the minimum information needed for reuse while still allowing for significant detail if providers have it. Providing a standardized format for reporting these data will make them easier to find and search and enable researchers to pinpoint specimens of interest for data improvement or accumulate more data for broad temporal studies. The Chronometric Age Extension was also the first community-managed vocabulary to undergo the new Biodiversity Informatics Standards (TDWG) review and ratification process, thus providing a blueprint for future Darwin Core extension development.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Age variability and time averaging in oyster reef death assemblages
S. R. Durham, G. P. Dietl, … C. P. Clark·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2022
- Ignoring stratigraphic age uncertainty leads to erroneous estimates of species divergence times under the fossilized birth-death process
J. Barido-Sottani, G. Aguirre-Fernandez, … R. C. Warnock·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2018
- Measuring the temporal quality of a biodiversity database
L. Underhill·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2021
- Estimating the age of poorly dated fossil specimens and deposits using a total-evidence approach and the fossilized birth-death process
J. Barido-Sottani, D. Zyla, T. A. Heath·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2021
- AncientMetagenomeDir dating metadataset highlights need for standardised radiocarbon reporting in ancient DNA
Katherine Hearne, Diāna Spurīte, … Aida Andrades Valtueña·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2026
- Ignoring fossil age uncertainty leads to inaccurate topology and divergence times in time calibrated tree inference
J. Barido-Sottani, N. van Tiel, … R. C. Warnock·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2020