bioRxivMicrobiology
Unexpected activity of oral fosfomycin against resistant strains of Escherichia coli in murine pyelonephritis.
A. Pourbaix, F. Guerin, C. Burdet, L. Massias, F. Chau, V. Cattoir, B. R. Fantin
Abstract
Fosfomycin-tromethamine activity is well established for oral treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections but little is known about its potential efficacy in pyelonephritis. Ascending pyelonephritis was induced in mice infected with 6 strains of Escherichia coli (fosfomycin MICs: 1 g/ml to 256 g/ml). Urine pH was 4.5 before infection and 5.5-6.0 during infection. Animals were treated for 24h with fosfomycin (100 mg/kg subcutaneously every 4 hours) and CFU were enumerated in kidneys 24h after the last fosfomycin injection. Peak (20.5 g/ml at 1h) and trough (3.5 g/ml at 4h) levels in plasma were comparable to those obtained in human after an oral dose of 3 grams. Fosfomycin treatment significantly reduced bacterial loads in kidneys (3.65 log10CFU/g [min-max=1.83-7.03] and 1.88 log10CFU/g [1.78-5.74] in start-of-treatment control mice and treated mice, respectively, P < 10-6). However, this effect was not found to differ across the 6 study strains (P = 0.71) and between the 3 susceptible and the 3 resistant strains (P=0.09). Three phenomena may contribute to explain this unexpected in vivo activity: i) in mice, fosfomycin kidney/plasma concentrations ratio increased from 1 to 7.8 (95% CI, 5.2; 10.4) within 24 hours; in vitro, when pH decreased to 5: (ii) fosfomycin MICs for the 3 resistant strains (64-256 g/ml) decreased into the susceptible range (16-32 g/ml) and: iii) maximal growth rates significantly decreased for all strains and were the lowest in urine. These results suggest that local fosfomycin concentrations and physiological conditions may favour fosfomycin activity in pyelonephritis, even against resistant strains.
- organism: mouse
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prevalence, mechanisms and comparison of detection methods of fosfomycin resistance in E. coli from urinary tract infections
Jennifer L. Cottell, Mark A. Webber·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2017
- Drug Resistance without a cost? Common and uncommon routes to fosfomycin resistance in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
T. Bermudez, J. R. Brannon, … M. Hadjifrangiskou·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2023
- Spicing up urinary tract infections: synergistic action of fosfomycin with trans-cinnamaldehyde - insight to the mode of action
Monika Karczewska, Patryk Strzelecki, … Dariusz Nowicki·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2026
- In vitro evolution of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to fosfomycin resistance in a 3D cultured human bladder microtissue model
Beth James, M J Wilde, … Alasdair T. M. Hubbard·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- In-vivo Efficacy of a Phage Cocktail Therapy that Targets ESBL-producing Klebsiella species that cause Urinary Tract Infections
Rizka Oktarianti Ainun Jariah, Jennifer Schofield, … Melissa EK Haines·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2025
- Phage resistance accompanies reduced fitness of uropathogenic E. coli in the urinary environment
J. J. Zulk, J. R. Clark, … K. A. Patras·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2021