G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
The Updated Mouse Universal Genotyping Array Bioinformatic Pipeline Improves Genetic QC in Laboratory Mice
Matthew W BlanchardiD, John Sebastian SigmoniD, Jennifer BrennaniD, Chidima Ahulamibe, Michelle E AlleniD, Sam ArderyiD, Ralph Steven BariciD, Timothy A. BelliD, Joseph FarringtoniD, Dominic J. CiavattaiD, Marta C Cruz CisnerosiD, Madison Drushal, Martin T. FerrisiD, Rebecca C. FryiD, Christiann H. GainesiD, Bin GuiD, Mark T. HeiseiD, Pablo Hock, Richard Austin Hodges, Mia Hulgin, Tal KafriiD, Rachel LynchiD, Terry MagnusoniD, Darla R. MilleriD, Caroline E Y MurphyiD, , Fernando Pardo‐Manuel de VillenaiD
Abstract
The MiniMUGA genotyping array is a popular tool for genetic QC of laboratory mice and genotyping of samples from most types of experimental crosses involving laboratory strains, particularly for reduced complexity crosses. The content of the production version of the MiniMUGA array is fixed; however, there is the opportunity to improve arrays performance and the associated reports usefulness by leveraging thousands of samples genotyped since the initial description of MiniMUGA in 2020. Here we report our efforts to update and improve marker annotation, increase the number and the reliability of the consensus genotypes for inbred strains and increase the number of constructs that can reliably be detected with MiniMUGA. In addition, we have implemented key changes in the informatics pipeline to identify and quantify the contribution of specific genetic backgrounds to the makeup of a given sample, remove arbitrary thresholds, include the Y Chromosome and mitochondrial genome in the ideogram, and improve robust detection of the presence of commercially available substrains based on diagnostic alleles. Finally, we have made changes to the layout of the report, to simplify the interpretation and completeness of the analysis and added a table summarizing the ideogram. We believe that these changes will be of general interest to the mouse research community and will be instrumental in our goal of improving the rigor and reproducibility of mouse-based biomedical research.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Content and performance of the MiniMUGA genotyping array, a new tool to improve rigor and reproducibility in mouse research
John Sebastian Sigmon, Matthew W Blanchard, … Fernando Pardo‐Manuel de Villena·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2020
- Cleaning genotype data from Diversity Outbred mice
Karl W. Broman, Daniel M. Gatti, … Gary A. Churchill·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2019
- Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing facilitates accurate and cost-effective haplotype reconstruction in complex mouse crosses
Samuel J. Widmayer, Lydia K. Wooldridge, … Daniel M. Gatti·Mammalian GenomePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Utility of a high-resolution mouse single nucleotide polymorphism microarray assessed for rodent comparative genomics
Rachel D. Kelly, Maja Milojevic, … Kathleen Allen Hill·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2020
- In silico candidate variant and gene identification using inbred mouse strains
Matthias Munz, Mohammad Khodaygani, … Inken Wohlers·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2021
- rePROBE: Workflow for Revised Probe Assignment and Updated Probe-Set Annotation in Microarrays
Frieder Hadlich, Henry Reyer, … Klaus Wimmers·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2021