MethodsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Renovating the Barnes maze for mouse models of Dementia with STARR FIELD: A 4-day protocol for learning rate, retention and cognitive flexibility.
Aimee X. BertolliiD, Oday HalhouliiD, Matthew A. WeberiD, Yiming Liu-Martínez, Linder H. Wendt, Brianna BlaineiD, Ramasamy ThangaveliD, Sura Smadi, Preston J. PellatziD, Danlin Liu, Kaisa N. Bornhoft, Kalpana GuptaiD, Riley Dean, Margaret M. TishiD, Gemma KerriD, Shane A. HeineyiD, Eric B. EmmonsiD, Qiang Zhang, Serena B. GumusogluiD, Nandakumar S. NarayananiD, Joel C. GeerlingiD, Georgina M. AldridgeiD
Abstract
Land-based spatial mazes are a low-stress method to evaluate learning in rodent models of dementia. By using innate exploratory and hiding behavior, the Barnes maze requires fewer trials, allowing examination of early learning rate and retention, as well as executive and motivational features that can be characteristic of non-amnestic dementias. However, unwanted odor cues may disrupt interpretation of acquisition rate during typical learning trials. We designed and tested our Barnes FIELD protocol (Find the Invisible Exit to Locate the Domicile) to improve reproducibility, allow evaluation of learning trials, and limit experimenter influence. The protocol uses 3D-printed escape shuttles and docking tunnels, allowing mice to exit the maze to the home cage. We show evidence that our shuttles mitigate the possibility of undesired cues. We demonstrate the feasibility of our protocol across several models of cognitive impairment and aging, and develop an additional stage, the STARR (Spatial Training And Rapid Reversal) maze, to better challenge behavioral flexibility. By examining commonly used outcome measures we identify important considerations for interpretation. These insights are used to evaluate several models of cognitive change, including deficits in an Alzheimers disease mouse model, and behavioral flexibility in a model of brainstem dysfunction. This work provides comprehensive instructions to build, perform, and analyze a robust spatial maze that expands the range of behavioral and motivational outcomes that can be identified and screened. Our findings will aid interpretation of traditional protocols, enhance rigor and reproducibility, and provide an updated method to screen for cognitive changes in mice.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Two complementary circuits for spatial navigation in mouse: evidence from Fos mapping
Edyta Balcerek, Urszula Włodkowska, Rafał Czajkowski·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2023
- Scale space calibrates present and subsequent spatial learning in Barnes maze in mice
Y. Tachiki, Y. Suzuki, … I. Imayoshi·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2022
- A variant of the Morris water task for assessing learning and memory processes in mice
Jogender Mehla, Jamshid Faraji, … Robert J. McDonald·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2017
- Validation and standardization of a new radial-arm water maze protocol using a murine model of mild closed head traumatic brain injury
Teresa Macheda, Kelly N. Roberts, … Adam D. Bachstetter·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2020
- Schema-induced shifts in mice navigational strategies are unveiled by a minimal behavioral model of spatial exploration.
Christina-Anna Vallianatou, Alejandra Alonso, … Federico Stella·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2021
- An incremental training method with automated, extendible T-maze for training spatial behavioral tasks in rodents
E. Holleman, J. Maka, … F. Battaglia·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2019