ICES Journal of Marine ScienceEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Influence of predation mortality on past and future dynamics of Pacific Herring: implications for stock status and future biomass
Beau DohertyiD, Samuel D. N. JohnsoniD, Ashleen J. BensoniD, S. P. Cox, Jaclyn S. ClearyiD, Jim Lane
Abstract
The recovery of marine mammals from historical over-exploitation in the 1970s represents one of the largest changes in trophic structure in the northeast Pacific Ocean over the last century, for which the impacts on key forage species such as Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) are poorly understood. This has prompted hypotheses that increasing marine mammal populations are the primary cause for productivity declines for some fish stocks and their lack of recovery to historical abundance levels. In this study, we evaluate such a hypothesis for Pacific Herring by quantifying historical predation rates by key predators including cetaceans (Pacific Humpbacks, Grey Whales), pinnipeds (Stellar Sea Lions, Harbour Seals), and piscivorous fish (Pacific Hake). Predation mortality is quantified via a novel approach that integrates a single-species catch-at-age model with estimates of predator consumption derived from bioenergetic models. We found that predator consumption, largely driven by Humpback Whales, explained increasing Pacific Herring natural mortality rates in recent years and could be used to forecast future mortality. Incorporating higher future natural mortality rates produced higher estimates of current stock status (1.09-1.2B0) based on lower estimates of equilibrium unfished biomass (17.5-20.3 kt). Conversely, models that assumed mortality was more like the historical average had lower stock status (0.63B0) and higher estimates of unfished biomass (32.4 kt). We demonstrate a practical approach for ecosystem modelling that can be used to develop operating model scenarios for management strategy evaluation, improving scientific defensibility by removing an element of analyst choice for future mortality scenarios. We discuss how simpler modifications to single-species model assumptions can be more pragmatic for providing fisheries management advice, while more complex multi-species or ecosystem models might provide more nuanced insights for exploring research questions related to multi-species ecosystems and fisheries interactions.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The combined impact of killer whale consumptive and non-consumptive effects on northern sea otter population viability in the Western Aleutians Archipelago, Alaska
T. Tinker, P. Schuette, … W. Beatty·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2023
- Harbour seals are regaining top-down control in a coastal ecosystem
Geert Aarts, Sophie Brasseur, … Ingrid Tulp·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2018
- Wildlife depredation stabilizes ecological-economic systems and can lead to improved economic outcomes
Katrina Joan Davis, Roberto Salguero‐Gómez·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- Assessing the Sustainability of Pacific Walrus Harvest in a Changing Environment
Devin L. Johnson, Joseph M. Eisaguirre, … Joel L. Garlich‐Miller·Journal of Wildlife ManagementPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2024
- Predation of stocked salmon by riparian wildlife in semi-natural stream
Kouta Miyamoto, Theodore E. Squires, Hitoshi Araki·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2017
- Accounting for salmon body size declines in fishery management can reduce conservation risks
Jan Ohlberger, Daniel E. Schindler, Benjamin A. Staton·Fish and FisheriesPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2024