D. Moher

Biomedical researchers perspectives on the reproducibility of research: a cross-sectional international survey

This study surveys biomedical researchers' views on research reproducibility, finding a perceived crisis with 72% agreement, pressure to publish as a leading cause, and limited institutional support for replication.

Cardiology researchers' practices and perceived barriers related to open science: an international cross-sectional survey

This survey examines cardiology researchers' practices and perceived barriers to open science, finding low formal training and high interest in institutional support.

Sex and Gender Considerations in Reporting Guidelines of Health Research: A Systematic Review

This study reviews reporting guidelines to assess how often sex and gender are addressed, finding low integration of these concepts.

'Nepotistic journals: a survey of biomedical journals.

The paper analyzes biomedical journals to identify potential editorial bias using PPMP and Gini indices, finding that some journals have a disproportionate number of publications by a few authors, often on editorial boards.

A systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting

This paper examines 44 biomedical and medical preprint platforms, comparing their characteristics, policies, and providing a searchable database for stakeholders.

Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project

This study analyzes citation metrics of journals removed from Scopus for publication concerns, finding increased citations post-removal and prevalence of predatory practices.

Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences: a cross-sectional analysis of 146 universities

This study analyzes promotion and tenure criteria in biomedical sciences across 146 universities, finding traditional criteria are more commonly used than progressive ones.

What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses.

This study estimates the epistemic impact of retractions on meta-analyses, finding that retractions due to data issues reduce effect sizes by 30%, while plagiarism-related retractions have no impact.