Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
C. F. D. Carneiro, V. G. S. Queiroz, T. C. Moulin, C. A. M. Carvalho, C. B. Haas, D. Rayee, D. E. Henshall, E. A. De-Souza, F. E. Amorim, F. Z. Boos, G. D. Guercio, I. R. Costa, K. L. Hajdu, L. van Egmond, M. Modrak, , O. B. Amaral
This study compares reporting quality between preprints and peer-reviewed articles, finding peer-reviewed articles have slightly better reporting quality but preprints are still valid scientific contributions.
bioRxiv · Oct 8, 2020Scientific Communication & Education