Author

S. Straus

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Ecology· 2 Scientific Communication & Education· 1

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Approach:statistical model· 3 Research Focus:ecology & biodiversity· 2 Organism:multiple species· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Forbes· 2 shared M. I. O'Connor· 2 shared A. T. Ford· 1 shared A.-L. Gehman· 1 shared C. Harley· 1 shared C. J. Little· 1 shared C. Tannenbaum· 1 shared D. A. Main· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2018-2022 · peak 2/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 24 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

2 shared papersEcology

C. Forbes

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

3 papers

Recent·Most cited

Temperature impacts on dengue incidence are nonlinear and mediated by climatic and socioeconomic factors

D. Kirk, S. Straus, M. Childs, M. Harris, L. Couper, J. Davies, C. Forbes, A.-L. Gehman, M. Groner, C. Harley, K. Lafferty, V. Savage, E. Skinner, M. I. O'Connor, E. A. Mordecai

This study examines how temperature affects dengue incidence globally, finding nonlinear relationships influenced by climatic and socioeconomic factors.

bioRxiv · Jun 15, 2022 · PreprintEcology

Macroecological variation in movement profiles: body size does not explain it all

S. Straus, C. Forbes, C. J. Little, R. M. Germain, D. A. Main, M. I. O'Connor, P. L. Thompson, A. T. Ford, D. Gravel, L. M. Guzman

The paper analyzes movement profiles across vertebrates to show that body size does not fully explain movement distances, highlighting the role of ecological and biomechanical constraints.

bioRxiv · Apr 21, 2022 · PreprintEcology

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist

H. O. Witteman, M. Hendricks, S. Straus, C. Tannenbaum

This study finds that female grant applicants face a gender gap in funding when peer reviewers assess the scientist's caliber but not when they assess the science itself.

bioRxiv · Mar 2, 2018Scientific Communication & Education