bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Of Problems and Opportunities - How to Treat and How to not Treat Crystallographic Fragment-Screening Data
M. S. Weiss, J. Wollenhaupt, G. J. Correy, J. S. Fraser, A. Heine, G. Klebe, T. Krojer, M. Thunnissen, N. M. Pearce
Abstract
In their recent commentary in Protein Science, Jaskolski et al. analyze three randomly picked diffraction data sets from fragment-screening group depositions from the PDB and, based on that, claim that such data are principally problematic. We demonstrate here that if such data are treated properly, none of the proclaimed criticisms persist.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analysis of the Quality of Macromolecular Structures
Dinakar M. Salunke·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2017
- Data and Diversity Driven Development of a Shotgun Crystallisation Screen using the Protein Data Bank
Gabriel Abrahams, Janet M. Newman·Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2021
- Challenges in solving structures from radiation-damaged tomograms of protein nanocrystals assessed by simulation
A. Peck, Q. Yao, … G. J. Jensen·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2020
- Decision-making in serial crystallography: a simple test to quickly determine whether sufficient data have been collected
David von Stetten, Arwen R. Pearson·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2026
- Challenge data set for macromolecular multi-microcrystallography
J. M. Holton·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2018
- Damaged goods? Evaluating the impact of X-ray damage on conformational heterogeneity in room temperature and cryo-cooled protein crystals
F. Yabukarski, T. Doukov, … D. Herschlag·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2021