bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
Modeling the Co-Activation of Inflammatory Genes1Mediated by NFκB and IRF-3 During Viral Infections
Abstract
Innate immune responses of host cells are activated upon exposure to external stimuli such as viral infections. These activations trigger the signaling pathways involved in antiviral responses. Activated pathways play a crucial role in the regulation of inflammatory and antiviral responses involving transcription factors, cytokines, cell surface viral sensors, and the activation of target genes. Although the role of key transcription factors such as NF-{kappa}B and IRF-3 in the regulation of antiviral genes that encode type I interferons (IFN/{beta}) is identified and well explored. The precise mechanistic understanding that governs their complex context-dependent temporal activation remains elusive. Here, we have developed a mathematical model to demonstrate the co-regulation of the expression of the IFN{beta} gene by Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF{kappa}B) and IFN Regulatory Factor-3 (IRF-3) after their activation in host cells by the viral analogue Poly I:C. In our model, the binding activities of the transcription factors NF{kappa}B and IRF-3 at the IFN{beta} promoter are modeled using a probability-based framework. Our results demonstrate that the expression pattern of IFN{beta} postviral infections would be pertaining to the co-activation of that by NF{kappa}B and IRF-3. In addition, the immediate expression of the IFN{beta} gene and, thus, the initial host response would be mainly attributed to immediate activation of NF{kappa}B while IRF-3 would be responsible for delayed but persistent expression of the IFN{beta}. Our model provides an underlying molecular mechanism for a similar response observed for Newcastle disease virus and the Vesicular stomatitis virus infection. Furthermore, we suggest that the rapid as well as an elevated and persistent expression of IFN{beta}, would be observed later due to a temporal bias in binding of both transcription factors NF{kappa}B and IRF-3, highlighting the need for coregulation of IFN{beta} by two different signaling pathways in a sequential manner. Also, our model predicts that the binding affinity of IRF3 to the promoter region of IFN{beta} would be equal to or larger than that of NF{kappa}B for a strong and persistent antiviral responses.
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A stimulus-contingent positive feedback loop enables IFN-β dose-dependent activation of pro-inflammatory genes
C. Wilder, D. Lefaudeux, … A. Hoffmann·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2022
- Identification of Interleukin1β as an Amplifier of Interferon alpha-induced Antiviral Responses
Katharina Robichon, Tim Maiwald, … Ursula Klingmüller·PLoS PathogensPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2020
- Non-self RNA rewires IFNβ signaling: A mathematical model of the innate immune response
Z. Korwek, M. Czerkies, … T. Lipniacki·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2022
- Gene regulatory logic of the interferon-β enhancer contains multiple selectively deployed modes of transcription factor synergy
Allison Schiffman, Cheng Zhang, … Alexander Hoffmann·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2025
- Type I and III interferons differentially encode inflammatory gene activation through threshold control of ISGF3 dynamics
Henrry Dubon Martinez, Rajshree Chettiyar, … Catera L. Wilder·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2026
- Interferon-β induction heterogeneity during KSHV infection is correlated to levels and activation of the transcription factors ATF2 and RelA, and not IRF3
Machika Kaku, Marta Maria Gaglia·PLoS PathogensPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2026