henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint

Have AI-Generated Texts from LLM Infiltrated the Realm of Scientific Writing? A Large-Scale Analysis of Preprint Platforms

H. Cheng, B. Sheng, A. Lee, V. Chaudhary, A. G. Atanasov, N. Liu, Y. Qiu, T. Y. Wong, Y.-C. Tham, Y.-F. Zheng

PDFDOI

Abstract

Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, AI-generated texts have inevitably permeated various types of writing, sparking debates about the quality and quantity of content produced by such large language models (LLM). This study investigates a critical question: Have AI-generated texts from LLM infiltrated the realm of scientific writing, and if so, to what extent and in what setting? By analyzing a dataset comprised of preprint manuscripts uploaded to arXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv over the past two years, we confirmed and quantified the widespread influence of AI-generated texts in scientific publications using the latest LLM-text detection technique, the Binoculars LLM-detector. Further analyses with this tool reveal that: (1) the AI influence correlates with the trend of ChatGPT web searches; (2) it is widespread across many scientific domains but exhibits distinct impacts within them (highest: computer science, engineering sciences); (3) the influence varies with authors who have different language speaking backgrounds and geographic regions according to the location of their affiliations (Italy, China, etc.); (4) AI-generated texts are used in various content types in manuscripts (most significant: hypothesis formulation, conclusion summarization); (5) AI usage has a positive influence on papers impact, measured by its citation numbers. Based on these findings, suggestions about the advantages and regulation of AI-augmented scientific writing are discussed.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.