Author

D. Tritz

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Scientific Communication & Education· 7

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Research Focus:benchmarking· 6 Approach:statistical model· 6

Frequent Co-Authors

M. Vassar· 6 shared S. Evans· 2 shared S. L. Rauh· 2 shared A. Bowers· 1 shared A. Johnson· 1 shared A. Niemann· 1 shared B. M. Vassar· 1 shared B. Norris· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2019-2019 · peak 7/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 14 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

6 shared papersScientific Communication & Education

M. Vassar

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

7 papers

Recent·Most cited

Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature

T. Hughes, A. Niemann, D. Tritz, K. Boyer, H. Robbins, M. Vassar

This study assesses transparency and reproducibility in surgical literature, finding low availability of materials, protocols, data, and analysis scripts, and minimal pre-registration and citations.

bioRxiv · Oct 7, 2019Scientific Communication & Education

Reproducible and Transparent Research Practices in Published Neurology Research

S. L. Rauh, T. Torgerson, A. Johnson, J. Pollard, D. Tritz, M. Vassar

This study evaluates reproducibility in neurology research by analyzing access to materials, data, scripts, and preregistration in sampled publications.

bioRxiv · Sep 26, 2019Scientific Communication & Education

Evaluation of Reproducibility in Urology Publications

S. L. Rauh, B. S. Johnson, A. Bowers, D. Tritz, M. Vassar

This study evaluates reproducibility in urology publications and finds most lack essential components like raw data, analysis scripts, and pre-registration information.

bioRxiv · Sep 25, 2019 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education

Evaluation of Reproducible and Transparent Research Practices in Sports Medicine Research: A Cross-sectional study

S. Evans, I. Fladie, M. Anderson, D. Tritz, M. Vassar

This study evaluates reproducibility and transparency in sports medicine research by analyzing 195 publications and finds that most lack data availability statements, protocols, analysis scripts, or pre-registration.

bioRxiv · Sep 25, 2019 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education

Analysis of Practices to Promote Reproducibility and Transparency in Anaesthesiology Research: Are Important Aspects Hidden Behind the Drapes?

O. Okonya, D. Rorah, D. Tritz, B. Umberham, M. Wiley, M. Vassar

This study assesses reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research by analyzing 300 publications and finds most lack data availability and preregistration statements.

bioRxiv · Aug 12, 2019 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education

Evaluation of Reproducible and Transparent Research Practices in Pulmonology

C. Smith, J. Nolan, D. Tritz, T. Heavener, J. Pelton, K. Cook, M. Vassar

This study evaluates reproducibility in pulmonology research, finding low availability of materials, protocols, and analysis scripts.

bioRxiv · Aug 9, 2019 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education

Can Orthopaedics become the Gold Standard for Reproducibility? A Roadmap to Success

I. A. Fladie, S. Evans, J. Checketts, D. Tritz, B. Norris, B. M. Vassar

This study evaluates reproducibility in orthopaedic surgery journals by analyzing 300 publications, finding most lack data availability statements, protocols, and preregistration.

bioRxiv · Jul 30, 2019 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education