Freebie: A Multi-Camera System for Real-Time Markerless Hand Tracking in Non-Human Primates
J. C. Joseph, M. Ceradini, L. Liu, M. Kelberman, M. J. Mender, J. DeMatteo, O. Lee, H. Temmar, M. Copenhaver, A. Ward, T. Kung, C. A. Chestek, Anne DraelosiD
Abstract
Objective. Neural decoders for dexterous finger movements are limited by the accuracy with which ground truth movement is measured. In non-human primates (NHPs), hand kinematics are typically recorded with instrumentation that constrains movement dimensionality. We evaluated whether a markerless camera system could replace conventional methods for tracking movements in real time. Approach. We developed Freebie, a real-time markerless system for tracking NHP finger movements. Keypoints detected online were used in place of manipulandum bend sensor signals. Two NHPs performed tasks by flexing fingers to move a virtual hand into target zones. The virtual hand was directly controlled using bend sensors or Freebie-derived kinematics, or indirectly controlled through a Kalman filter (KF) decoding kinematics from forearm electromyographic (EMG) activity. We quantified Freebie's accuracy relative to manual labels, agreement with bend sensor measurements, and latencies. We assessed online performance under Freebie control and compared EMG KFs trained using Freebie-derived labels with those trained using bend-sensor-derived labels. Main Results. We observed a median end-to-end latency of 15.8 ms at a 30 FPS camera acquisition rate, and 16.2 ms at 60 FPS. Freebie labels closely tracked bend sensor positions (median |r|=0.96). Median keypoint errors were 1.7 to 6.5 pixels, below the 20-pixel width of the smallest tracked finger. Direct Freebie control did not differ from bend sensor control on five of six online metrics; path efficiency was higher with Freebie. EMG KFs trained on Freebie-derived labels performed similarly to those trained on bend sensor labels online. When evaluated offline, models trained with Freebie had lower error. Significance. These findings indicate that bend sensors are not required to obtain finger labels for training a decoder: markerless keypoints alone provided effective labels. This is an important first step towards real-time tracking of more complex movements, beyond what could be easily measured with a manipulandum.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Validation of two-dimensional video-based inference of finger kinematics with pose estimation
L. Gionfrida, W. Rusli, … A. E. Kedgley·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2022
- ATHENA: Automatically Tracking Hands Expertly with No Annotations
Daanish M. Mulla, Mario Costantino, … Jonathan A. Michaels·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2025
- Validating marker-less pose estimation with 3D x-ray radiography
D. D. Moore, J. D. Walker, … N. G. Hatsopoulos·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2021
- Validation of marker-less pose estimation for 3D kinematics during upper limb reaching
I. Avni, L. Landau, … L. Shmuelof·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2023
- Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture
R. M. Kanko, E. K. Laende, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020
- Refined shoulder kinematics via markerless bony landmark detection and acromial 3D shape using an RGB-D camera during hand-cycling
Amedeo Ceglia, Lucas Mulhaupt, … Lama Séoud·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2025