Sign in
Genetic & Genomic MedicinemedRxiv
Preprint

A pan-cancer regulatory atlas of 6,983 GWAS variants prioritizes recurrent regulatory annotations and candidate programs at cancer risk loci

Subhajit DuttaiD

Abstract

O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=159 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26353369v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (64K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fdfceforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e8e1aforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@138b0d5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e18517_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Genome-wide association studies have identified thousands of cancer risk variants in non-coding regions, yet their regulatory mechanisms remain largely uncharacterized. Here we present a regulatory annotation atlas of 6,983 genome-wide significant variants across 23 cancer types, scored using multimodal AlphaGenome predictions and integrated with ENCODE-4, Roadmap Epigenomics, and JASPAR 2024 annotations. Most variants (70.5%) fall outside annotated cis-regulatory elements; 27.7% overlap enhancers and 1.4% overlap promoters. Comparison with 6,626 position-matched eQTL control variants suggests that enhancer-classified variants carry 1.86-fold higher predicted effects (P = 10-) and promoter variants 7.84-fold (P = 2.5 x 10-{superscript 1}). A composite prioritization score (RegVar-basic, excluding GWAS-derived pleiotropy and TF disruption, AUC = 0.650; RegVar-full, AUC = 0.675) outperforms CADD (0.499) and LINSIGHT (0.558) in this cancer-gene discrimination benchmark. Within-locus ranking across 2,626 GTEx DAP-G eQTL credible sets shows that RegVar identifies the highest-posterior-probability variant in 47.3% of loci (P = 7.0 x 10-{superscript 1}3), while CADD performs at chance. Predicted target genes show 67.7% concordance with GTEx eQTL assignments. Permutation-controlled motif analysis highlights NFKB1/NF-{kappa}B, STAT1, IRF1, and ARNT as exploratory permutation-enriched candidate transcription factors at cancer risk loci. This atlas provides a resource for interpreting non-coding cancer susceptibility variants. Because AlphaGenome uses expression-related training data, GTEx-based validations should be interpreted as partially orthogonal rather than fully independent.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISXavier '22Jones '20Rashkin '20Nameki '22Trynka '15Zhang '20
62% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Joana M. Xavier, Ramiro Magno, Roslin Russell+11 more·medRxiv·Mar 8, 2022· 1 citations