bioRxivImmunology
A simple strategy for sample annotation error detection in cytometry datasets
M. Smithmyer, A. E. Wiedeman, D. A. G. Skibinski, A. K. Savage, C. Acosta-Vega, S. Scheiding, V. H. Gersuk, S. A. Long, J. H. Buckner, C. Speake
Abstract
Mislabeling samples or data with the wrong participant information can impact study integrity and lead investigators to draw inaccurate conclusions. Quality control to prevent these types of errors is commonly embedded into the analysis of genomic datasets, but a similar identification strategy is not standard for cytometric data. Here, we present a method for detecting sample identification errors in cytometric data using expression of HLA class I alleles. We measured HLA-A*02 and HLA-B*07 expression in 3 longitudinal samples from 41 participants using a 33-marker CyTOF panel designed to identify major immune cell types. 3/123 samples (2.4%) showed HLA allele expression that did not match their longitudinal pairs. Furthermore, these same three samples cytometric signature did not match qPCR HLA class I allele data, suggesting that they were accurately identified as mismatches. We conclude that this technique is useful for detecting sample labeling errors in cytometric analyses of longitudinal data. This technique could also be used in conjunction with another method, like GWAS or PCR, to detect errors in cross-sectional data. We suggest widespread adoption of this or similar techniques will improve the quality of clinical studies that utilize cytometry.
- organism: human
- assay: flow cytometry
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CytoScan: Automated detection of technical anomalies for cytometry quality control
Tim R. Mocking, Felix Zwolle, … Costa Bachas·Cytometry Part APeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2026
- cytoFlagR: A comprehensive framework to objectively assess high-parameter cytometry data for batch effects
Shruti Eswar, Zachary T. Koenig, … Sandra Andorf·bioRxiv·May 27, 2025
- A Modified Injector and Sample Acquisition Protocol Can Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inter-Instrument Variability of the Helios Mass Cytometer
- CyAnno: A semi-automated approach for cell type annotation of mass cytometry datasets
Abhinav Kaushik, Diane Dunham, … Sandra Andorf·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2021
- Donor-Specific Plasma Factors Contribute to Aberrant Staining Artifacts with a Commercial Lyophilized Mass Cytometry Antibody Panel
D. Geanon, B. Lee, A. H. Rahman·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2020
- CytoPheno: Automated descriptive cell type naming in flow and mass cytometry
Amanda R. Tursi, Celine Silva Lages, … Sandra Andorf·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2025