Sign in
BioinformaticsBioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

DeepMAsED: Evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies

Olga Mineeva, Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Ruth E. LeyiD, Bernhard SchölkopfiD, Nicholas D. YoungblutiD

Abstract

Motivation/backgroundMethodological advances in metagenome assembly are rapidly increasing in the number of published metagenome assemblies. However, identifying misassemblies is challenging due to a lack of closely related reference genomes that can act as pseudo ground truth. Existing reference-free methods are no longer maintained, can make strong assumptions that may not hold across a diversity of research projects, and have not been validated on large scale metagenome assemblies.\n\nResultsWe present DeepMAsED, a deep learning approach for identifying misassembled contigs without the need for reference genomes. Moreover, we provide an in silico pipeline for generating large-scale, realistic metagenome assemblies for comprehensive model training and testing. DeepMAsED accuracy substantially exceeds the state-of-the-art when applied to large and complex metagenome assemblies. Our model estimates close to a 5% contig misassembly rate in two recent large-scale metagenome assembly publications.\n\nConclusionsDeepMAsED accurately identifies misassemblies in metagenome-assembled contigs from a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea without the need for reference genomes or strong modelling assumptions. Running DeepMAsED is straight-forward, as well as is model re-training with our dataset generation pipeline. Therefore, DeepMAsED is a flexible misassembly classifier that can be applied to a wide range of metagenome assembly projects.\n\nAvailabilityDeepMAsED is available from GitHub at https://github.com/leylabmpi/DeepMAsED.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.