Sign in
Genetic & Genomic MedicineNAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Automated GenePy Gene-Burden Computation via a Reproducible Nextflow Workflow Integrated with the Genomics England (GEL) Lifebit Platform

Iman NazariiD, Guo ChengiD, James John AshtoniD, Sarah EnnisiD

Abstract

Interpretation of rare-disease genomes remains constrained by variant-centric analytical frameworks that insufficiently capture the cumulative impact of multiple variants within a gene. GenePy provides an individual-level, gene-based burden metric that integrates variant consequence, allele frequency, and zygosity into a unified quantitative score, enabling a transition from discrete variant annotation to aggregated gene-level interpretation. In the context of Genomics England, this formulation supports a panel-agnostic, genotype-to-phenotype diagnostic strategy for unresolved monogenic disorders by prioritising genes with elevated mutational burden per individual. Here, we present a fully automated, containerised GenePy workflow deployed through Nextflow and integrated within the Genomics England (GEL) Research Environment via the Lifebit CloudOS platform. This implementation provides scalable, secure, and governance-compliant computation of gene-level burden scores across population-scale cohorts. The workflow harmonises variant annotation, quality control, and chunked data aggregation within modular, reproducible processes designed for high-throughput execution on cloud-native infrastructure. By enabling robust, portable, and auditable gene-level scoring across large rare-disease sequencing datasets, this framework enhances analytical resolution and supports downstream statistical prioritisation, integrative phenotype matching, and hypothesis generation within genotype-to-phenotype diagnostic workflows.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMossotto '19Munro '26Richmond '20Kavak '26Liang '25Bridges '25
64% semantic matchGenomics
Enrico Mossotto, James John Ashton, Luke O’Gorman+4 more·BMC Bioinformatics·May 16, 2019· 33 citations