Sign in
Systems BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Cell-CLIP: Multi-algorithm causal discovery of directed cell program interaction networks from single-cell transcriptomics

Mohammed Khodor Firas Al-Tal, Xiong LiuiD, Joseph ZhouiD

Abstract

Cell-cell communication networks govern tissue function in health and disease, yet existing computational tools rely on static ligand-receptor databases or correlation-based analyses that cannot distinguish direct causal relationships from confounded or indirect associations. We introduce Cell-CLIP (Cellular Causal Learning and Inference Pipeline), a modular framework that combines (i) mask-aware patient-level JASMINE activity scoring with low-percentile imputation in raw activity space, (ii) five complementary causal-discovery algorithms -- PC, GES, FCI, DirectLiNGAM, and GRaSP -- each fed an algorithm-matched per-column transform of the same masked JASMINE matrix, (iii) direction-preserving bootstrap aggregation with a weighted two-phase consensus, (iv) Joint Causal Inference (JCI) for principled pooling of patient cohorts via context indicators, and (v) a residual-independence (RESIT) direction audit, all evaluated under a systematic three-by-three-by-three hyperparameter sweep. Applied to a 611-patient multi-phenotype lung atlas spanning normal tissue, COVID-19 pneumonia, and lung cancer, the cross-cohort joint-causal-inference graph constructed by stratifying patients into normal, COVID-19, and tumour contexts before pooling recovers 100% of evaluable curated ground-truth edges (8/8; Wilson 95% CI 0.68-1.00) with 75.0% direction accuracy (6/8; 95% CI 0.41-0.95) and zero forbidden-orientation violations (0/8; 95% CI 0.00-0.32) -- the only configuration in a comprehensive ablation series spanning 7 cohort/pool configurations, 27 hyperparameter settings, and 3 consensus types to simultaneously reach all three optimal Pareto corners. The single-cohort universal cross-phenotype graph (12 cross-phenotype programs over the full 611-patient atlas) similarly achieves 100% evaluable recall (8/8; 95% CI 0.68-1.00) with 62.5% direction accuracy (5/8; 95% CI 0.31-0.86) and zero forbidden violations (0/3; 95% CI 0.00-0.56) under the same systematic hyperparameter sweep with low-percentile imputation, exceeding an earlier zero-imputation baseline configuration of the pipeline on every reported metric (Table 6, Table 8); given small ground-truth denominators (n_eval = 8), these point-estimate improvements lie within the Wilson 95% intervals of the baseline and should be read as direction-of-effect rather than as confirmatory comparisons. We further show that single-cohort causal inference on the disease-extended pooled cohorts (which apply the COVID- and cancer-extended program sets to all 611 patients) recovers strong skeleton recall (35.0%-55.2% evaluable) but suffers a structural direction collapse (down to 14.3% direction accuracy and 60% forbidden rate at union) caused by within-cohort averaging over heterogeneous normal-plus-disease patient populations; the patient-stratified joint-causal-inference pool dissolves this collapse without altering the underlying algorithms. Cell-CLIP provides a hypothesis-generating framework for inferring directed cell-program networks from patient-level scRNA-seq atlases, with all reported relationships requiring experimental validation due to observational data limitations. O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b18810org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5c027eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a7b806org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@122adf2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ca0a39_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable 6C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONHeadline validation metrics across reporting cohorts, with Wilson 95% confidence intervals on every binomial rate. C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1653cb1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@173c6baorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fc115forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d87e39org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@46d53b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable 8C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONAblation matrix: evaluable recall at the recall-best configuration. Variants are defined in the Sensitivity analysis section. Cells marked not run were not executed for that combination of cohort x variant; reasons are given in the table caption. C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.