Sign in
BioinformaticsGenome Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Memory-bound k-mer selection for large evolutionary diverse reference libraries

Ali Osman Berk ŞapcıiD, Siavash MirarabiD

Abstract

Using k-mers to find sequence matches is increasingly used in many bioinformatic applications, including metagenomic sequence classification. The accuracy of these down-stream applications relies on the density of the reference databases, which, luckily, are rapidly growing. While the increased density provides hope for dramatic improvements in accuracy, scalability is a concern. Reference k-mers are kept in the memory during the query time, and saving all k-mers of these ever-expanding databases is fast becoming impractical. Several strategies for subsampling have been proposed, including minimizers and finding taxon-specific k-mers. However, we contend that these strategies are inadequate, especially when reference sets are taxonomically imbalanced, as are most microbial libraries. In this paper, we explore approaches for selecting a fixed-size subset of k-mers present in an ultra-large dataset to include in a library such that the classification of reads suffers the least. Our experiments demonstrate the limitations of existing approaches, especially for novel and poorly sampled groups. We propose a library construction algorithm called KRANK (K-mer RANKer) that combines several components, including a hierarchical selection strategy with adaptive size restrictions and an equitable coverage strategy. We implement KRANK in highly optimized code and combine it with the locality-sensitive-hashing classifier CONSULT-II to build a taxonomic classification and profiling method. On several benchmarks, KRANK k-mer selection dramatically reduces memory consumption with minimal loss in classification accuracy. We show in extensive analyses based on CAMI benchmarks that KRANK outperforms k-mer-based alternatives in terms of taxonomic profiling and comes close to the best marker-based methods in terms of accuracy.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISStorato '20Ingels '24Pockrandt '22Wahl '25Nasko '18Nyström-Per '25
71% semantic matchBioinformatics
Davide Storato, Matteo Comin·Lecture notes in computer science·Jan 1, 2020· 6 citations