bioRxivBiophysics
A Saturation-Mutagenesis Analysis of the Interplay Between Stability and Activation in Ras
F. Hidalgo, L. M. Nocka, N. H. Shah, K. Gorday, N. R. Latorraca, P. Bandaru, S. Templeton, D. Lee, D. Karandur, J. G. Pelton, S. Marqusee, D. Wemmer, J. Kuriyan
Abstract
Cancer mutations in Ras occur predominantly at three hotspots: Gly 12, Gly 13, and Gln 61. Previously, we reported that deep mutagenesis of H-Ras using a bacterial assay identified many other activating mutations (Bandaru et al. eLife, 2017). We now show that the results of saturation mutagenesis of H-Ras in mammalian Ba/F3 cells correlate well with results of bacterial experiments in which H-Ras or K-Ras are co-expressed with a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). The prominent cancer hotspots are not dominant in the Ba/F3 data. We used the bacterial system to mutagenize Ras constructs of different stabilities and discovered a feature that distinguishes the cancer hotspots. While mutations at the cancer hotspots activate Ras regardless of construct stability, mutations at lower-frequency sites (e.g., at Val 14 or Asp 119) can be activating or deleterious, depending on the stability of the Ras construct. We characterized the dynamics of three non-hotspot activating Ras mutants by using NMR to monitor hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX). These mutations result in global increases in HDX rates, consistent with the destabilization of Ras. An explanation for these observations is that mutations that destabilize Ras increase nucleotide dissociation rates, enabling activation by spontaneous nucleotide exchange. A further stability decrease can lead to insufficient levels of folded Ras - and subsequent loss of function. In contrast, the cancer hotspot mutations are mechanism-based activators of Ras that interfere directly with the action of GAPs. Our results demonstrate the importance of GAP surveillance and protein stability in determining the sensitivity of Ras to mutational activation.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Clinically observed RASA1 missense mutants exhibit diverse RasGAP protein behaviors
Maxum E. Paul, Rediet B. Delelegne, … Titus J. Boggon·Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Comparative MD simulations and advanced analytics based studies on wild-type and hot-spot mutant A59G HRas
R. Joshi, N. Sharma, U. Sonavane·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2020
- Bronsted-basic small molecules activate GTP hydrolysis in Ras Q61 mutants
Yecheng Wang, Si‐Cong Chen, … Ziyang Zhang·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2025
- Allosteric site variants affect GTP hydrolysis on RAS
C. W. Johnson, S. K. Fetics, … C. Mattos·bioRxiv·May 29, 2023
- Comparative effects of oncogenic mutations G12C, G12V, G13D, and Q61H on local conformations and dynamics of K-Ras
S. Vatansever, B. Erman, Z. H. Gumus·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2020
- Oncogenic G12D mutation alters local conformations and dynamics of K-Ras
S. Vatansever, B. Erman, Z. Gumus·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2018