bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
Engineering single-AAV CRISPR-Cas13 RNA base editors for treatment of inherited retinal diseases
Satheesh KumariD, Heng-Ai Chang, Deborah AubiniD, Yi-Wen HsiaoiD, Alicia A. BrunetiD, Jun YangiD, Liuhui HuangiD, Chi D. LuuiD, Alex William HewittiD, Fan Li, Lewis E Fry, Lívia S. CarvalhoiD, Anai Gonzalez-CorderoiD, Guei‐Sheung LiuiD
Abstract
Site-directed RNA editing, especially RNA base editing, allows for specific manipulation of RNA sequences, making it a useful approach for the correction of pathogenic mutations. Correction of RNA transcripts allows therapeutic gene editing in a safe and reversible manner and avoids permanent alterations in the genome. RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas nucleases (e.g., CRISPR-Cas13) enable delivery within a single adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector for RNA base editing, making the approach clinically feasible. Here, we used the inactive CRISPR-Cas13bt3 (also known as Cas13X.1) fused to the ADAR2 deaminase domain (ADAR2DD) for targeted correction of inherited retinal disease (IRD) mutations. First, we show in vitro that dCas13bt3-ADAR2DD can efficiently correct a pathogenic nonsense mutation (c.130C>T [p.R44X]) found in the mouse Rpe65 gene and recover protein expression in retinal pigment epithelium cells (RPEs). Across clinically reported RPE65 mutations, we observed editing efficiencies ranging from 0% to 60%. In the Rpe65-deficient mouse model of retinal degeneration (rd12), we observed that RNA base editing can recover Rpe65 expression in RPEs and rescue retinal function with no observable adverse effects. We further employed our RNA base editor against the large USH2A gene to assess the promise of RNA base editing for addressing untreatable IRDs caused by genes too large for AAV gene delivery. Against the human USH2A in vitro, we observed up to 60% on-target efficiency. We further found that gRNA mismatches, domain-inlaid ADAR2DD design and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the RNA base editor optimised on-target and bystander editing for a highly precise base editor. Against the mouse Ush2a in vitro, we similarly observed up to 60% on-target editing in mammalian cells, while in the Ush2aW3947X mice, we observed [~]12% on-target editing, with no impact on retinal structure or function, or transcriptome-wide editing. Overall, our findings demonstrate dCas13bt3-ADAR2DD as a potent tool for gene therapy against IRDs, addressing a significant unmet clinical need in ophthalmology.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Characterisation of RNA editing and gene therapy with a compact CRISPR-Cas13 in the retina
Satheesh Kumar, Yi-Wen Hsiao, … Guei‐Sheung Liu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2024
- Therapeutic adenine base editing corrects nonsense mutation and improves visual function in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis
Dong Hyun Jo, Hyeon‐Ki Jang, … Jeong Hun Kim·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2021
- Comparison of CRISPR/Cas endonucleases for in vivo retinal gene editing.
F. Li, K. Wing, … A. W. Hewitt·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2020
- In vivo base editing rescues photoreceptors in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa
Jing Su, Kaiqin She, … Yang Yang·Molecular Therapy — Nucleic AcidsPeer-reviewed·Feb 14, 2023
- Direct delivery of Cas9 or base editor protein and guide RNA complex enables genome editing in the retina
C. Botto, J. Pulman, … D. Dalkara·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2023
- Nonviral base editing of KCNJ13 mutation preserves vision in an inherited retinal channelopathy
Meha Kabra, Pawan Kumar Shahi, … Bikash Ranjan Pattnaik·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2022