Sign in

Abstract

Clinical genetic testing demand has increased in the era of precision medicine. However, availability of cancer genetic services remains limited in the US, prompting a rise in telehealth delivery. This report describes the Penn Telegenetics Program experience using a local healthcare provider collaborative model. From 2018-2025, 473 providers (89.4%) successfully registered. Providers were predominately MD/DO licensed (85.0%). Family medicine was the most frequent speciality (54.3%), followed by internal medicine (20.9%) and clinical oncology (11.8%). Most providers were in suburban locations by zip codes (56.2%), 20.1% were in rural zip codes. Only 56 providers declined collaboration (10.6%); the most common reasons reported were preferring local genetic services (22.5%) and not being comfortable as the ordering provider (22.5%). Our data demonstrate that most local providers are willing to collaborate with a centralized telegenetics program. Refining procedures to increase collaborative care and engagement may provide opportunities to increase access to cancer genetic testing.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLee '26Mastaglio '26Russell '24Raspin '25Lee '25Shannon '23
61% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Kimberley T. Lee, Brian Lee Egleston, Dominique Fetzer+18 more·Journal of Clinical Oncology·May 27, 2026