A Powerful Approach for Identification of Differentially Transcribed mRNA Isoforms
Abstract
Next generation sequencing is being increasingly used for transcriptome-wide analysis of differential gene expression. The primary goal in profiling expression is to identify genes or RNA isoforms differentially expressed between specific conditions. Yet, the next generation sequence-based count data are essentially different from the microarray data that are continuous type, therefore, the statistical methods developed well over the last decades cannot be applicable. For this reason, a variety of new statistical methods based on count data of transcript reads has been correspondingly developed. But currently the transcriptomic count data coming only from a few replicate libraries have high technical noise and small sample size bias, performances of these new methods are not desirable. We here developed a new statistical method specifically applicable to small sample count data called mBeta t-test for identifying differentially expressed gene or isoforms on the basis of the Beta t-test. The results obtained from simulated and real data showed that the mBeta t-test method significantly outperformed the existing statistical methods in all given scenarios. Findings of our method were validated by qRT-PCR experiments. The mBeta t-test method significantly reduced true false discoveries in differentially expressed genes or isoforms so that it had high work efficiencies in all given scenarios. In addition, the mBeta t-test method showed high stability in performance of statistical analysis and in estimation of FDR. These strongly suggests that our mBeta t-test method would offer us a creditable and reliable result of statistical analysis in practice.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differential transcript usage from RNA-seq data: isoform pre-filtering improves performance of count-based methods
Charlotte Soneson, Katarina L Matthes, … Mark D Robinson·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2015
- An evaluation of RNA-seq differential analysis methods
Dongmei Li, Martin Stuart Zand, … Zidian Xie·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2022
- Bayesian inference of differentially expressed transcripts and their abundance from multi-condition RNA-seq data
Xi Chen·bioRxiv·May 16, 2019
- Differentially Expressed Heterogeneous Overdispersion Genes Testing for Count Data
Yubai Yuan, Qi Xu, … Annie Qu·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2024
- Dividing out quantification uncertainty enables assessment of differential transcript usage with limma and edgeR
Pedro L. Baldoni, Lizhong Chen, … Gordon K. Smyth·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Do count-based differential expression methods perform poorly when genes are expressed in only one condition?
Xiaobei Zhou, Mark D Robinson·Genome BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2015