Chromatin accessibility predictions reveal lineage-structured effects of noncoding variants across hematopoiesis
Abstract
Background. Noncoding variants account for over 90% of genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings, but their mechanisms are often unclear. Sequence-to-function models provide one approach to variant interpretation by predicting the effects of genetic variation on molecular phenotypes. ChromBPNet predicts variant effects on chromatin accessibility, but how these predictions are organized across differentiation hierarchies and relate to orthogonal predictions remains unclear. Results. We trained ChromBPNet models for 17 hematopoietic cell types and scored 302,830 variants. Of 242,307 variants accessible in at least one cell type, 5.6% were predicted to alter chromatin accessibility. Variants active in more cell types had larger predicted effects. Predicted effects also reflected hematopoietic lineage structure, with sharing declining with lineage distance while effect direction was preserved in 99.6% of parent-child comparisons. ChromBPNet predictions agreed with GWAS fine-mapping but largely identified distinct variants. Fine-mapping-only variants were enriched for coding and transcript-associated variation, whereas ChromBPNet-only variants were enriched for regulatory elements, accessible chromatin, and trait-relevant activity. In K562 CRISPRi datasets, predicted accessibility gain showed limited association with target-gene validation. Regulatory elements containing CTCF motifs were less likely to have validated target genes, consistent with a role in chromatin organization rather than gene activation. Conclusions. ChromBPNet and fine-mapping provide complementary information about variant function. Predicted accessibility effects identify the cell types in which noncoding variants are likely to act and capture relationships across the hematopoietic hierarchy, but provide limited information about the genes they regulate. All predictions are available at: https://bloodnnet.ccbr.utoronto.ca/.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- In vivo measurement and prediction of cell-type-resolved non-coding variant effects in human immunity
Qiaoqiao Liu, Jingjing Zhang, … Zhihong Liu·medRxiv·May 6, 2026
- Tree Based Co-Clustering Identifies Variation in Chromatin Accessibility Across Hematopoietic Cell Types
Thomas B. George, Nathaniel K. Strawn, Sivan Leviyang·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2021
- ChromBPNet: bias factorized, base-resolution deep learning models of chromatin accessibility reveal cis-regulatory sequence syntax, transcription factor footprints and regulatory variants
Anusri Pampari, Anna Shcherbina, … Anshul Bharat Kundaje·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2024
- Interrogation of human hematopoiesis at single-cell and single-variant resolution
Jacob C. Ulirsch, Caleb A. Lareau, … Vijay G. Sankaran·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2019
- Transcription factor networks disproportionately enrich for heritability of blood cell phenotypes
Jorge Diego Martin-Rufino, Alexis Caulier, … Vijay G. Sankaran·SciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2025
- Tissue context determines the penetrance of regulatory DNA variation
Jessica M. Halow, Rachel Byron, … Matthew T. Maurano·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 14, 2021