Sign in

Abstract

The impact of rehabilitation on post-stroke motor recovery and its dependency on the patients chronicity remain unclear. The existence and regularity of a, so called, proportional recovery rule across a range of functional deficits and therapies supports the notion that functional interventions have little or no impact beyond spontaneous recovery rates in a critical window of recovery which lasts from 3 to 6 months post-stroke. In this meta-analysis, we apply a bootstrap analysis method to assess the overall impact of a specific VR-based rehabilitation protocol for the upper extremities on a homogeneous sample of 219 individuals with hemiparesis at various stages post stroke. Our analysis uncovers a precise gradient of sensitivity to treatment that expands more than one year beyond the limits of the so-called critical window of recovery. These findings redefine the limits of the so-called critical window of recovery and suggest that stroke-derived plasticity mechanisms do facilitate functional recovery even at the chronic and late chronic stage.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCervera '18Carballo-Ca '22Zeiger '21Branscheidt '19Saionz '19Hope '18
66% semantic matchNeuroscience
María A. Cervera, Surjo Raphael Soekadar, Junichi Ushiba+4 more·Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology·Mar 25, 2018· 579 citations