A reformulation of the t-test in single-cell transcriptomics dramatically reduces false positives
Abstract
The default differential expression tests in single-cell analysis software provide fast and simple approaches that help practitioners annotate cell populations identified through clustering algorithms. Here, we use theoretical arguments and empirical studies to show that these tests suffer from inflated false positive rates that affect the resulting annotations. We introduce LN's t-test, which tests a novel, asymptotically unbiased log-fold change estimator and avoids these false positives, without compromising speed.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression
Jordan W. Squair, Matthieu Gautier, … Grégoire Courtine·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2021
- Valid post-clustering differential analysis for single-cell RNA-Seq
Jesse M. Zhang, Govinda M. Kamath, David N. C. Tse·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Stratified Test Accurately Identifies Differentially Expressed Genes Under Batch Effects in Single-Cell Data
Shaoheng Liang, Qingnan Liang, … Ken Chen·IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2021
- Single-cell differential expression analysis between conditions within nested settings
Leon Hafner, Gregor Sturm, Markus List·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2024
- Fast, scalable and accurate differential expression analysis for single cells
Debarka Sengupta, Nirmala Arul Rayan, … Shyam Prabhakar·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2016
- Differential expression analysis in single cell and spatial RNASeq without model assumptions
Gennady Margolin, Andrew Tang, Sergey Leikin·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2026