Contributions of Site Heterogeneity in Multi-site Brain-Phenotype Predictions
Guanru CheniD, Megan Jones, Ishaan GadiyariD, Theodore D Satterthwaite, Andrew Chen, Simon VandekariD
Abstract
Machine learning studies of brain-phenotype associations typically summarize accuracy with a single Pearson correlation, yet in harmonized multi-site data this metric is shaped by training-set size, feature and outcome variability, and true effect heterogeneity. We analyzed structural MRI data from the Reproducible Brain Charts consortium. After preprocessing and quality control, 3486 participants from 9 sites were retained. Three training set compositions were used to understand contributions of site heterogeneity after harmonization: within-site (Local), size-downsampled multi-site (Multi-Down), and full multi-site (Multi-Full). Another site-agnostic strategy (Overall) pooled all sites into a single dataset. All strategies included the target site in the training and testing samples. These analyses separate the contribution of the site effect from that of sample size. Between-site heterogeneity was extensive (age I^2 {approx} 95%). The overall correlation of age prediction (r = 0.73) exceeded the within-site meta-analytic estimate (Multi-Full r = 0.63). The improvement of correlation in the pooled dataset was driven by a mechanical inflation from the larger outcome variance. At matched sample size, within-site training outperformed harmonized multi-site training. Increasing the multi-site training sample size did not yield a significant advantage over within-site training. The apparent advantage of cross-dataset training thus appears to reflect training-set size rather than a benefit of multi-site composition per se. The same pattern generally held for the weaker brain-p-factor signals. Together, these results indicate that between-site heterogeneity in machine learning brain-phenotype prediction persists after harmonization. We recommend reporting site-level prediction accuracy and feature dispersion and standard deviation of the outcome variable alongside any pooled estimate to improve inter-site and inter-study comparison of machine learning prediction accuracy.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sample size requirement for achieving multisite harmonization using structural brain MRI features
Pravesh Parekh, Gaurav Vivek Bhalerao, … Ganesan Venkatasubramanian·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2022
- Brain-phenotype predictions can survive across diverse real-world data
Brendan D. Adkinson, Matthew Rosenblatt, … Dustin Scheinost·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2024
- Performance reserves in brain-imaging-based phenotype prediction
Marc-André Schulz, Danilo Bzdok, … Kerstin Ritter·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2023
- Harmonization techniques for machine learning studies using multi-site functional MRI data
Ahmed El-Gazzar, Rajat Mani Thomas, Guido Alexander van Wingen·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2023
- Imputation-Based Harmonization Mitigates Site Effects Without Data Leakage in Machine Learning Studies
Noah Hillman, Andrew Chen, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2026
- Translating phenotypic prediction models from big to small anatomical MRI data using meta-matching
Naren Wulan, Lijun An, … B.T. Thomas Yeo·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024