Toward AI-Resilient Screening of Nucleic Acid Synthesis Orders: Process, Results, and Recommendations
Bruce J. WittmanniD, Tessa AlexanianiD, Craig M. BartlingiD, Jacob BealiD, Adam J. CloreiD, James DiggansiD, Kevin FlyangoltsiD, Bryan T. GemleriD, Tom MitchelliD, Steven T. MurphyiD, Nicole E. WheeleriD, Eric HorvitziD
Abstract
Fast-moving advances in AI-assisted protein engineering are enabling breakthroughs in the life sciences that promise numerous beneficial applications. At the same time, these new capabilities are creating potential biosecurity challenges by providing new pathways to intentional or accidental synthesis of genes that encode hazardous proteins. The synthesis of nucleic acids is a key choke point in the AI-assisted protein engineering pipeline as it is where digital designs are transformed into physical instructions that can produce potentially harmful proteins. Thus, one focus for efforts to enhance biosecurity in the face of new AI-enabled capabilities is on bolstering the screening of orders by nucleic acid synthesis providers. We describe a multistakeholder, cross-sector effort to address biosecurity challenges with uses of AI-powered biological design tools to reformulate naturally occurring proteins of concern to create synthetic homologs that have low sequence identity to the wild-type proteins. We evaluated the abilities of traditional nucleic acid biosecurity screening tools to detect these synthetic homologs and found that, of tools tested, not all could previously detect such AI-redesigned sequences reliably. However, as we report, patches were built and deployed to improve detection rates over the course of the project, resulting in a final mean detection rate over tools of 97% of the synthetic homologs that were determined, using in-silico metrics, to be more likely to retain wild-type-like function. Finally, we make recommendations on approaches for studying and addressing the rising risk of adversarial AI-assisted protein engineering attacks like the one we identified and worked to mitigate.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Limits of Sequence-Based Biosecurity Screening Tools in the Age of AI-Assisted Protein Design
Bruce J. Wittmann, Nicole E. Wheeler, … Eric Horvitz·Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2026
- Experimental evaluation of AI-driven protein design risks using safe biological proxies
Svetlana P. Ikonomova, Bruce J. Wittmann, … Geoffrey J. Taghon·bioRxiv·May 15, 2025
- Bypassing Current Biosecurity Screens with AI Designed Proteins and Closing the Gap with Edge-AI Functional Screening
Mackenzie Noon, Grace Oualline·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2026
- Safety First: Input Screening for Protein Design Tools
Phil Palmer, Nicole A. Teran, … Jaime M. Yassif·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- DNAS-Bench: Deterministic Nucleic Acid Screener Benchmarking
Henry C. Wong, Tadayoshi Kohno, Jeff Nivala·IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)Peer-reviewed·May 21, 2026
- Inter-tool analysis of a NIST dataset for assessing baseline nucleic acid sequence screening
Tyler S. Laird, Kevin Flyangolts, … Samuel P. Forry·Applied BiosafetyPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2025