Hazard detection with monocular bioptic telescopes in a driving simulator

ABSTRACT\n\nPurpose: Recently we developed a driving simulator paradigm to evaluate detection of road hazards when using a bioptic telescope and conducted an initial study using normally-sighted observers with simulated vision loss. We now extend our investigation to quantifying the extent to which visually impaired bioptic users are able to use their fellow (non-telescope) eye to compensate for the ring scotoma of a monocular bioptic telescope. We tested the hypothesis that detection rates would be higher in binocular viewing (fellow eye could potentially compensate) than monocular viewing (fellow eye patched so it could not compensate) for pedestrian hazards present in the scene only while the telescope was being used.\n\nMethods: Sixteen bioptic telescope users (17-80 y) completed six test drives, including three with binocular viewing interleaved between three with monocular viewing. While driving, they used their own monocular bioptic telescopes to read information on highway road signs (n = 71) and pressed the horn when they saw a pedestrian hazard (n = 50). Twenty-six of the pedestrians were programed to appear, run on the road ahead of the driver for 1s within the ring scotoma and then disappear, within the period when participants were reading signs through the bioptic. The timing of the head movement to look into and out of the bioptic was determined and events were then categorized by whether or not the pedestrian hazard was present in the scene only while using the bioptic.\n\nResults: When pedestrian hazards were in the scene only while subjects were using the bioptic to read a sign, detection rates were significantly higher in binocular than monocular viewing (68% vs. 40%). However, when pedestrians when subjects had a brief view of the pedestrian either beforeor after looking through the bioptic, then detection rates did not differ in binocular and monocular viewing (78% vs. 79%). By comparison, when not using the bioptic detection rates were higher (> 90%) and reaction times were shorter (without 0.95 s vs. with 1.25 s)\n\nConclusions: Our results suggest that under binocular viewing conditions the fellow eye was able to compensate for the ring scotoma to a certain extent when subjects used a monocular telescope to read road signs; however, performance was not as good as without the bioptic.