BioRAG-DRAG: A Multimodal Biological Retrieval Layer for Local-First Biomedical Agents
Abstract
Biomedical agents need reliable access to heterogeneous evidence: literature text, gene and pathway records, protein sequences, DNA/cDNA sequences, and structured biological relations. Classical sequence tools such as BLAST remain the right choice for alignment-grounded verification, but they are not a unified context interface for large language model agents. We present BioRAG-DRAG, a local-first multimodal retrieval layer that combines pluggable neural sequence-text retrieval, BLAST verification, and graph-based evidence packaging. Specialized encoders such as ESM-2 can serve protein partitions, while OmniGene CPT provides a unified biological-language backbone for mixed sequence/text and agent-facing use; BLAST reranks or verifies sequence candidates; and DRAG graphs expose typed, traceable paths for downstream agents. We introduce BioRAG-Standard v0, a partitioned corpus/library with 257,886 retrievable records and an initial annotation layer for engineering evaluation built from Open-Rosalind Standard biomedical records and sequence-window extensions. On an in-index sequence-window stress test, BLAST nearly saturates biological matching, while vector retrieval recovers substantial but lower biological match rates. On held-out parent-fragment controls, public protein encoders outperform the current OmniGene protein-window embedding, while DNA/cDNA dense retrieval remains weak even with off-the-shelf Nucleotide Transformer pooling; this supports a model-agnostic BioRAG design rather than a claim that one unified generator backbone is the best sequence-search encoder. Indexed Chroma lookup over Standard text and 100k sequence-window collections adds only small lookup overhead after query embedding; this does not measure end-to-end instant latency. Finally, exploratory sequence DRAG traces show inspectable biological neighborhoods, including immunoglobulin-family and gene-symbol modules, with initial graph controls indicating non-random but partly sequence-similarity-driven structure. These results support a bounded architecture: vector retrieval supplies unified candidate context, while BLAST and DRAG provide biological verification and evidence attribution.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Biomedical Literature Analysis
Revanth Reddy Palem, Hao Chen, Zongliang Yue·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026
- Open-Rosalind: Tool-First Biomedical LLM Agents with Process-Aware Benchmarking
Liang Wang·bioRxiv·May 8, 2026
- Queryome: Orchestrating Retrieval, Reasoning, and Synthesis across Biomedical Literature
Pranav Punuru, Nabil Ibtehaz, … Daisuke Kihara·Journal of Biomedical SemanticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2026
- Federated Knowledge Retrieval Elevates Large Language Model Performance on Biomedical Benchmarks
Janet Joy, Andrew I. Su·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Addressing challenges in agentic retrieval of structured data from biomedical databases
Abhishek Halder, Manvendra Singh, … Debarka Sengupta·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026
- An Evidence-Grounded Research Assistant for Functional Genomics and Drug Target Assessment
Ksenia Sokolova, Dmitri Kosenkov, … Olga G. Troyanskaya·bioRxiv·Dec 31, 2025