Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Practical Identifiability of a Minimal Adaptive Learning-Gain Model for Binary Feedback: A Simulation Study

Wei LiiD, Jie ZhongiD

Abstract

Social learning is shaped by distinct computational components--baseline beliefs (prior mean), feedback sensitivity (learning gain), and temporal uncertainty (drift)--that empirical designs rarely disentangle. We evaluate practical identifiability and predictive performance of a parsimonious four-parameter adaptive learning-gain model for binary feedback, where a latent belief about positive-outcome probability updates deterministically between observations and an internal confidence-precision state decays each trial. {sigma}, {omega}, and {lambda} are internal, model-defined variables--not validated psychological constructs. Using fixed-seed simulations, we report four findings. Joint maximum-likelihood recovery is poor: on a 24-condition grid (T=80), {sigma} and {omega} show near-zero tolerance-based recovery ([≤]0.002) across tolerances 0.3-1.0, {lambda} recovers at 0.078-0.263, and longer sequences do not improve recovery. Profile-likelihood and trade-off diagnostics show flat regions for {sigma} and {omega} and an asymmetric {lambda} profile, indicating weak practical (not structural) identifiability. A fitting-parity audit fixed a return-order bug in the fixed-gain candidate. After correction, block-level model discrimination is 0.48 (72/150) under common bounds--above chance (p<0.001)--but is driven almost entirely by Rescorla-Wagner (0.88-0.90); the adaptive filter and its nested fixed-gain restriction remain indistinguishable. Across 50 held-out datasets, the model shows no predictive advantage over an empirical-frequency baseline (paired 95% CIs span zero). Ablations show the added update components provide no consistent benefit. These results caution against interpreting individual parameter estimates from this model class in short binary-feedback designs, and specify that mechanistic claims about clinical group differences in {sigma}, {omega}, or {lambda} require graded responses, manipulated volatility, multi-context sequences, and longitudinal replication.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBallard '19Hahn '25Cochran '19Moens '19Mkrtchian '23Fang '26
68% semantic matchNeuroscience
Ian C. Ballard, Samuel M. McClure·Journal of Neuroscience Methods·Jan 18, 2019· 57 citations