Sign in
MicrobiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Smartphone-Coupled Phase Contrast Microscopy Combined with Deep Transfer Learning for Candida Species Identification: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Athanasia SergouniotiiD, Dimitris RigasiD, Dimitris KallesiD

Abstract

Species-level Candida identification can inform antifungal management, but reliable identification platforms remain inaccessible in many clinical microbiology laboratories, whereas phase contrast microscopy -- a common feature of routine laboratory microscopes -- is widely available. We asked whether this ubiquitous optical tool, combined with a consumer smartphone and deep transfer learning, could provide a feasible low-cost approach for preliminary Candida species discrimination. Fifteen clinical isolates of four species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei) were collected from a single clinical microbiology laboratory and imaged using a consumer-grade smartphone coupled to a standard phase contrast microscope. Suspensions in human serum were imaged immediately after preparation (T0) and after 2-hour incubation at 37{degrees}C (T2). Pretrained vision backbone architectures were evaluated as fixed feature extractors under strict Leave-One-Strain-Out cross-validation. The best-performing model -- EfficientNet-B0 embeddings with a Linear Support Vector Machine applied to T2 images -- achieved an apparent internally cross-validated strain-level balanced accuracy of 0.833 and an overall strain accuracy of 86.7% (13/15 strains correctly classified). C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis were each identified with 100% recall. Both misclassified strains belonged to C. krusei -- the species with the smallest panel representation (n=3 strains) -- with misclassification attributable to limited strain diversity and suboptimal image quality. These findings demonstrate promising feasibility for preliminary image-based Candida species discrimination from smartphone-acquired phase contrast microscopy images, and support further evaluation in larger, externally validated strain collections.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.