Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Cortical eigenmode coordinates provide compact subject-level signatures across structural MRI, resting-state fMRI, and EEG

Hyung ParkiD, Thaddeus TarpeyiD

Abstract

A practical barrier in multimodal neuroimaging is that structural MRI, fMRI, and EEG are often analyzed in modality-specific spaces or reduced to atlas- and sensor-based summaries, limiting the construction of common, interpretable subject-level brain signatures. We evaluate cortical Laplace-Beltrami eigenmode coordinates as a shared geometry-aligned language for structural MRI (sMRI), resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), and EEG. In this framework, sMRI morphometric fields are represented by cortical eigenmode coefficients, rs-fMRI by covariance among eigenmode time-series coefficients, and EEG by mode-frequency-condition summaries. Using the Max Planck Institute Leipzig Mind-Brain-Body dataset (MPI-LEMON), we compared unimodal eigenmode-coordinate summaries, multimodal cortical eigenmode-coordinate PCA, conventional atlas/sensor-based PCA and ridge representations, and geometric eigenmode multiview factorization (GEMF). GEMF is a structured decomposition that preserves the modality-native organization of the data objects while separating shared from modality-specific variation. Eigenmode-coordinate representations yielded compact subject-level signatures with strong external validity for chronological age and a secondary cognitive outcome. Multimodal eigenmode-coordinate PCA was among the strongest-performing approaches, reached high age-prediction performance at moderate dimension, and consistently outperformed conventional low-dimensional PCA. GEMF selected an even lower-dimensional shared representation and remained competitive with the benefit of providing interpretable shared and modality-specific factors. These findings support cortical eigenmode coordinates as a practical foundation for compact, interpretable, and multimodally aligned subject-level brain signatures.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.