Taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking of phase-separating protein predictors

BackgroundBiomolecular condensates formed via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) play vital roles in cellular organization and function. Computational prediction of phase-separating proteins (PSPs) is increasingly used to prioritize candidates at proteome scale, making robust, well-designed benchmarks essential for fair evaluation and iterative improvement of PSP predictors. ResultsWe first show that a recently released PSP benchmark is substantially confounded by the imbalances in taxonomic origin and intrinsic-disorder compositions between positive and negative sets, allowing predictors to achieve high apparent performance by exploiting non-LLPS shortcuts and obscuring their true ability to distinguish PSPs. To minimize these effects, we construct a taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched PSP benchmark. Using this benchmark, we find that absolute sequence and biophysical feature values of PSPs differ markedly across taxa, whereas LLPS-associated feature shifts relative to taxon-specific proteome backgrounds are comparatively conserved. Benchmarking twenty PSP predictors under this framework reveals pronounced taxon-dependent variation in performance. Moreover, PSPs lacking IDRs consistently constitute a more challenging regime across methods, motivating routine disorder-stratified evaluation. ConclusionsOur taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking framework reduces shortcut-driven biases, enables more interpretable evaluation of PSP predictors, and provides guidance for developing models that capture transferable LLPS-associated signals rather than dataset- or taxon-specific shortcuts.