Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

Agent-optimized GPU polygenic scoring at cohort scale

Adam AfyouniiD, Boyuan Yang, Cong LiuiD

Abstract

A polygenic score (PGS) is a unitless weighted sum of allele dosages, interpretable only as a percentile within a reference distribution. Evaluating risk across models requires scoring each individual against a whole reference panel, but current CPU pipelines process targets or models sequentially, making full cross-product calculations prohibitively expensive. We reformulated PGS calculation as a cohort-wide sparse matrix product on a GPU and optimized it via an autonomous coding agent under read-only inputs, cold starts, and strict numerical validation against pgsc_calc. The scorer was "trained" by the agent accessing synthetic data and real 1000 Genomes data. On a synthetic benchmark, the scorer achieved a 10.6-fold speedup during the training course (184.9 s to 17.4 s) and ran 71-fold faster than pgsc_calc. However, on held-out real genomes, the synthetic-trained scorer was 15.3-fold slower than the real-data-trained version and diverged significantly from pgsc_calc (maximum absolute difference of 3.7x10-1 vs. 3.1x10-4). Three replications of the synthetic loop from an identical prompt showed that agent optimization trajectory variance explains 91 to 96% of total wall-clock variance, against 0 to 2.6% for the data sampled and 0.2 to 3.3% for repeated execution. A memory-bounded rebuild then scored all the 3,202 1000 Genome genotypes against all 5,385 models in 6.5 h within a 72 GB memory cap, released here as a frozen scoring manifest with ancestry-stratified reference distributions for the whole PGS Catalog

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISReales '21Faucon '22Kolosov '25Lambert '24Lehmann '23Pope '26
58% semantic matchGenetics
Guillermo Reales, Elena Vigorito, Martin Kelemen+1 more·Bioinformatics·Jun 17, 2021· 6 citations